reply to post by SonOfTheLawOfOne
reply to post by Sly1one
i don't like to detract from the "worth 1000 words" power of the video above. but i will offer a brief explanation.
i really like that Sly1one brought up the example of "flatland". it is quite pertinent. in the following illustration, you will see particles
moving in across a single dimension. their movements form a regular pattern of compression and rarefaction.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/34c0cdde3869.gif[/atsimg]
in the next drawing, you can see that the compression and rarefaction across a single plane are correlated across a second domain. this is shown as
UPDOWN correlated to LEFTRIGHT.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/dac447183362.jpg[/atsimg]
so now, if you will, observe during the camera rotation reaches the half-point. this is the point of intersection across the third (of three)
dimensions. a snapshot, rendered below, shows
exactly how activity within the first two dimensional planes are coordinated by angular momentum
across the third dimension. (observe the UP and LEFT orientation)
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/fcd1a62f26bc.jpg[/atsimg]
the reverse of this, of course, is the DOWN and RIGHT correlation. this is achieved by rotating the image by 180 degrees.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b1e8885d1af7.jpg[/atsimg]
it should be noted that, although the image is rotated by 180 degrees, the original angles themselves were at a 45 degree angle. therefore the
cumulative angular difference between the UPDOWNLEFTRIGHT is
*90 degrees*
.....the most wonderful thing about this all is that, once you have digested all of the technical information, you can watch the video and see quite
plainly how a rotation of 90 degrees across a single dimensional plane results in a "MAGNETIC" polarization of the particle units involved in the
transaction.
i hope that this explaination is sufficient. please let me know if you need any more details.