It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by searching4truth
reply to post by maybereal11
From what I've seen of the candidates replies on the local news, they all seem to agree that Rahm is ineligible under the current law and they all discussed the possibility of changing it in the future, but will not impact next months election, and the law must be followed.
Originally posted by searching4truth
As to soldiers, that was one of the arguments in the appeal. The judge agreed that there was a significant difference between "dodging bombs in Iraq" and collecting a $170,000 salary from an appointed government position that you could leave/be fired from at any time.
The court order states, "We believe, therefore, that the initial purpose of the 'reside in' requirement for candidates, and the failure of the legislature to alter that language in the current Municipal Code, strongly indicates that the phrase 'resided in' as used in the Municipal Code requires actual, not constructive, residence."
The decision goes on to say, a candidate "must have actually resided within the municipality for one year prior to the election, a qualification that the candidate unquestionably does not satisfy."
The court agreed with Emanuel’s contention that he met Chicago’s voter residency standard but added that wasn’t enough to allow his run for mayor.
"...a candidate must meet not only the Election Code's voter residency standard, but also must have actually resided within the municipality for one year prior to the election, a qualification that the candidate unquestionably does not satisfy," the ruling stated.
Rahm Emanuel stays on mayoral ballot while Chicago residency reviewed
Breaking news was announced on the Chicago Mayoral elections on January 25, 2011. The Illinois State Supreme Court has ruled that candidate Rahm Emanuel must be listed on the ballots until the Chicago residency issue is decided, according to a news report on WGN. Rahm Emanuel's lawyer appealed the January 24, 2011 decision by the Illinois Apellate Court that Emanuel did not meet the residency requirement.
Originally posted by Jakes51
reply to post by searching4truth
Could you provide a source? If they said that it is not good, and a blow to the whole idea of them being impartial. How can they say anything about it, without reviewing the facts of the case first? I suppose they got their cash filled envelopes with their morning coffee? It sounds like more political mischief in Illinois?
“The appellate court decision is stayed,’’ the Supreme Court’s order reads. “The Board of Elections is directed that if any ballots are printed while this Court is considering this case, the ballots should include the name of petitioner Rahm Emanuel as a candidate for Mayor of the City of Chicago.’’
Originally posted by searching4truth
reply to post by maybereal11
The interview I was referring to was aired on cltv this morning with the one of the lawyer's I will try to find it.
Of course their opinion is biased, I didn't say otherwise, the fact remains they were discussing changing the law or the wording of the law in the future, however to their joy it doesn't effect the current situation.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
And what happened to supporting the courts???
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
And what happened to supporting the courts???
The two Appellate Court judges responsible for tossing Rahm Emanuel from the ballot in February's mayoral race both won their jobs after being anointed by a Chicago political power broker who openly supports an Emanuel opponent.
Whether or not their opinions are colored by politics, the case has recharged the debate among critics who decry a process of selecting judges that relies more heavily on political clout than merit.
Longtime Appellate Court Judges Thomas E. Hoffman and Shelvin Louise Marie Hall — who on Monday ruled that Emanuel's stay in Washington precludes him from running for mayor this year — were both judicial candidates slated for election by the Cook County Democratic Party judicial slating committee chaired by Ald. Edward Burke, 14th.
www.chicagotribune.com...
Burke, one of Chicago's most powerful politicians, holds huge sway in the election of judges at every level, including the Illinois Supreme Court, where his wife, Anne, sits as a justice and where the Emanuel ballot question is now headed for a final decision.
Illinois' highest court agreed Tuesday to decide whether Rahm Emanuel can run for Chicago mayor, and justices ordered election officials not to print any ballots without his name until they rule on the case.