It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pretty good ufo footage B.C. Canada

page: 2
20
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 12:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nebulous1973
reply to post by CrazyMonkey
 

I do thank you for the heads up..I never heard of him..and actually it was the part at 11 minutes 40 seconds that got me interested enough to share it here..regardless of this guy and his channel that part of the video is pretty convincing..lol..anyway just figured i'd share it..Thank you again for the heads up!!


I am a skeptic, but a healthy one. I will admit when I am stumped heres a case which impressed me.

www.youtube.com...

Also Rendlesham forest.

I also pay particular notice to reports by commercial airline pilots, which you can google for.
edit on 24-1-2011 by CrazyMonkey because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 02:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Nebulous1973
 


Awesome video, thanks. Mind blowing footage really (at 11:40).

I found another good one if you want to check it out (abovetopsecret.com...).

Peace,
Ot
edit on 1/24/2011 by Overtime because: clarification



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 02:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by CrazyMonkey
I am a skeptic, but a healthy one. I will admit when I am stumped heres a case which impressed me.
www.youtube.com...


Good one
Didn't have that in my list



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 06:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by Overtime
reply to post by Nebulous1973
 


Awesome video, thanks. Mind blowing footage really (at 11:40).

I found another good one if you want to check it out (abovetopsecret.com...).

Peace,
Ot
edit on 1/24/2011 by Overtime because: clarification


For the original video, and the ones who's minds are blown by the object at 11:40
what is so spectacular at 11:40? its just the way the camera lens pics up the light that shapes it into a bell like shape. Then he whips the camera off the object? looks like a planet or moon to me.

for the second video, these are the ones I only care about. But I wish we had all the names that were in the helicopter and the two that were in the car. I like stories with multiple witness that are interviewed on camera.
but we always only see/hear one witness at a time??

The reason UFO phenomenon gets so cluttered is videos like the first that are nothing, and then real good cases that need to be investigated more with all witnesses combined.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 07:34 AM
link   
At the end of the video the guy filming says that on veiwing the footage he can clearly see that the ufo is "cylindrical" can anyone else see this?



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 08:23 AM
link   
Just a few bits, he says he's a reporter for a news site, I think people took that one step to far and proposed he was media news.

The one bad thing on the video, the annoying music, unneeded & unwanted, if you wish to cheapen your video then add music.

Other than that he sounded correct, was doing all the right things like on a stand, said he would watch till it moved and generally made sure there were land marks to verify. For that it makes it more likely it was a ufo, the bell shape with something under it was odd, seemed to suggest something either supported or trailing something ie a basket??.

The views through the tree's did seem to suggest at times that there was a search light of sorts where you could see a direction to the light.

The thing that interests me is that if the location we were looking at was the same as the daytime video then it would seem that either there was a mist or low cloud covering the mountains as the sky is a uniform colour with no sign of the mountains. If that's the case then if its a star its being seen through cloud or mist and rather large.

No idea on this one..

And also loved the Helicopter linked video, never seen that before....

Good thread so far..
edit on 24-1-2011 by Mclaneinc because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 11:38 AM
link   
I don't know what to think, I could see it being the real deal or as others have said car lights on a road, IMO. Unless it's proven as a hoax, it could be many things, that's why they're called ufo's.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 12:13 PM
link   
So the car idea is admirable....
but are you saying someone just has their car up there parked or better yet in a straight line at the angle at which its being pretty filmed...
cause it does seem to move a bit and change depth slightly


Car

edit on 24-1-2011 by antibren because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by antibren
[more

I couldn't tell in the beginning of the video if it's 2 separate lights that's being focused on or just one. The first object looks to be metallic and then it goes out of focus and then when it appears again it looks to be in a different spot and it looks like just a glowing object.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 01:47 PM
link   
I think car headlights is prtty far of a stretch.
The mountains are far enough away that car headlights would not be as big as the object,nor as bright.
The height of the object is above the mountains and looks to be nearer than they are.
Is there any enhacement we could be doing to the bell frames?
There looks to be more to the craft below it.
I am an hour north of the location, and will head down that way if the situation warrants it.....
loaded for bear too....
The UFO sightings here in s west BC seem to be a steady stream though certainly not a flap yet.
This is close enough to Comox air base, that fighters could have been vectored in to an intercept,and the UFO may have shown up on the Victoria airport radar. or comox airbase radar.
I will check the local papers, aand news for any follow ups later today....
The Newspaper may have an online edition, so it is The Victoria Times Colonist if anyone cares to look.
There may be more info in the Vancouver Sun too (they have a regular UFO reporter )
Or in The vancouver Province (the morning paper)
You can bet those of us nearby will be on the lookout though we are having rainy skies mostly these days.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by groingrinder
reply to post by zorgon
 


Yep you can definitely see the mountains in the background. They are about the right altitude above the city below for it to have been a vehicle driving on a mountain road. He claims he is filming it through "clouds", but some of those clouds have a defined vertical structure that looks like tree trunks to me.

I have seen car lights on mountain roads many times. I am no stranger to that sight.
edit on 1-24-2011 by groingrinder because: Edit for additional pornographic content.


Here is a screenshot from the OP's vid composited with another screenshot from another video in the YT users library. I used a house in the foreground to resize and overlay them in the right spot. You can clearly see that the object is not on the mountain.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/48d84aade19c.jpg[/atsimg]



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 02:36 PM
link   
This looks eerily similar to Jupiter, if it was moving and if the video didnt end with the trusting quote

"It DID vanish, but my camera ran out of memory"

It might carry more weight.

A solitary, unmoving light in the sky just isnt enough for me.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 02:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gradius Maximus
This looks eerily similar to Jupiter, if it was moving and if the video didnt end with the trusting quote

"It DID vanish, but my camera ran out of memory"

It might carry more weight.

A solitary, unmoving light in the sky just isnt enough for me.



It was overcast that night. There were no stars visible. The object DOES move. You have to actually watch the vid before commenting.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 02:40 PM
link   
I'm throwing the red flag*

Musical soundtrack!!! I will assume this has been edited and not authentic.

Now I will take my skeptic head out my skeptic behind and watch fully.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
Ok, so at what point does this light move or do something to suggest it is extraterrestrial?
I watched and I just don't see anything dazzling or any movement. He zooms in periodically and this does cause the light to take shape due the the light refraction and contour of the lens. But I truly see nothing more than a light in the sky. He said it was 8:30 at one point and 9:30 at another point. So in that hour, this is the only video to surface or report made? Unlikely. I think from his perspective he captured something of earthly origin that appears to his vantage point to be odd.

Also why edit it down? How do we know an hour really went by?!

I smell BS. This is deliberate edit and commentary to support his own claim.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
I enjoyed the musical and I render this video plausible. I am usually a skeptic but with a cloudy forecast I say it can't be Jupiter.

You can view the forecast on this site to cross reference:

victoria, BC weather for 01/22/2011



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by cluckerspud
Ok, so at what point does this light move or do something to suggest it is extraterrestrial?
I watched and I just don't see anything dazzling or any movement. He zooms in periodically and this does cause the light to take shape due the the light refraction and contour of the lens. But I truly see nothing more than a light in the sky. He said it was 8:30 at one point and 9:30 at another point. So in that hour, this is the only video to surface or report made? Unlikely. I think from his perspective he captured something of earthly origin that appears to his vantage point to be odd.

Also why edit it down? How do we know an hour really went by?!

I smell BS. This is deliberate edit and commentary to support his own claim.





At 1:10-2:23 you can clearly see it moving behind the tree limbs. It's obvious that he's not moving but the object is.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 03:12 PM
link   
The music was pretty bad and to be honest most of the time I watch any UFO video with music playing I close it, luckily the video was interesting enough to suffer through the music



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by CastleMadeOfSand
 


I did watch this video, and I live in the same part of the world, Zooming in and out, moving a camera around and editing to and from parts of footage without appropriate ending just siphons away any credibility this video may have had.

It sounds like you're trying to polish a turd - This is garbage footage from a biased source.

Were it legitimate - It was a failed attempt at capturing it.

Yet the slim possibility that it was a UFO still remains.

At one point it is blinking with 2 red lights, very plane like. Then it looks like Jupiter, Then a weird cylinder with a yellow light on top? Maybe its a transforming UFO?

The only footage of interest is when the object is orange, obscured by the trees. Where are the professional photographers when this phenomena occurs?

16:07 is the strangest part of the film.

edit on 24-1-2011 by Gradius Maximus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 03:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
At 1:10-2:23 you can clearly see it moving behind the tree limbs. It's obvious that he's not moving but the object is.

I see what you are saying. Maybe I should not have written "any movement". My bad. I was trying to say that was no display of maneuvers that would suggest an unknown propulsion system or un-earthly craft. I have several times viewed planes coming into Newark on a direct path and for about 15-20 minutes it looks like a flickering light hovering for 15-20 minutes as it approaches. I could film them and post em and you would swear this light was hovering in one spot. On top of this the, video has been edited and spliced. So do YOU know for sure that this was there for over an hour? I am certainly not sure. Could be a different light in each cut away for all we know.

Who's to say?! The videographer?! What are his credentials?!

.
edit on 24-1-2011 by cluckerspud because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join