It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by majestic3
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I have always thought the pyramids may have been built to hide some thing under them what better wayto hide something than to pile thousands of stones on top of it (just a thought)
Originally posted by tetsuo
^I'm curious as to the dating as well. I know you know your stuff Byrd, can you at least point us in the direction of whatever studies/researches are considered to be evidence of the dating of the Great Pyramid? I'd like to read the research that is usually cited as being proof/evidence of the currently accepted date. Thanks
Byrd: There's a rather huge amount of data, and it's not all in one convenient pile, nor was it something that they just tossed in a hat and guessed at. The study of data and debate over meaning of the data has been going on since the early years of Egyptology.
Byrd:This NOVA interview explains some of it, from the artifacts to radiocarbon dating on the mortar. It's not a very good article because it's very conversational, but does mention the large number of samples and resamples they used in doing radiocarbon dating as well as inscriptions on tombs:
Hawass: “Not even in five thousand years could carbon dating help archaeology. We can use other kinds of methods like geoarchaeology, which is very important, or DNA, or laser scanning, but carbon dating is useless. This science will never develop. In archaeology, we consider carbon dating results imaginary." - Dr Zahi Hawass, Science Magazine, 18 June 2010
"One part of Dima was 40,000 RCY [Radiocarbon Years], another was 26,000 RCY, and 'wood found immediately around the carcass' was 9,000-10,000 RCY." – Robert E. Lee, “Radiocarbon, Ages in Error”, (Anthropological Journal of Canada, Vol. 19, No.3, 1981), 9, 29
Byrd:This one discusses the problem of wood use (they reused old wood, which threw the dates off considerably.)
www.archaeology.org...
Byrd: They also discuss (and it's just in brief detail) how the art changed throughout time -- although they're similar there are stylistic differences in the art throughout the centuries as well as changes to writing and spelling (just as our own English language has changed from Chaucer's time to our time.)
Byrd: They also discuss (and it's just in brief detail) how the art changed throughout time -- although they're similar there are stylistic differences in the art throughout the centuries as well as changes to writing and spelling (just as our own English language has changed from Chaucer's time to our time.)
Byrd: Disintegration of the granite provided some clues (remember that the granite includes objects with inscriptions and names and dates):
www.jstor.org...
The positioning of the tomb of Khufu's mother (a smaller satellite pyramid to the great pyramid)
eric.ed.gov...
Byrd: Seals in and around the area show the names of the Pharaohs, including Khufu:
celebritysite.110mb.com...
Byrd: As to ordering the kings' list, yes, that involved several long arguments with scholars (they're still scrapping over dates and times of the Armana period (Ahkenaten, Tutankhamen). There's at least seven kings' lists which were used as starting points:
en.wikipedia.org...
Byrd: But in addition to that, artifacts were used to enhance and correct the data.
Byrd: So it was a heavily contested topic for many decades…
Byrd: Finds like the worker's village (with the names of the pharaohs found in tombs of the workers (along with titles like "overseer of the quarries of Khufu")) have provided more evidence about dates and lineages.
Originally posted by Trublbrwing
reply to post by Stormdancer777
There is an ever increasing group of scientists who believe the pyramid is 7 to 12 thousand years old, not the 3 thousand that puts it in the age of pharoahs. There have been recent discoveries of aquatic fossils in the upper stones and evidence of sea water erosion on stone faces indicating the pyramid was under water for a very long time.
IMO the Egyptians did not build the pyramid nor was it intended for burial, the lack of hyroglyphics within the structure (unlike every other Egyptian monument) indicates this is so. In addition the recent comment by an Egyptian professor that "there is something not of this world" within the pyramid hints at it's real purpose.
I think the time has come to unwrap this "gift" and see what is inside, to dismantle it from the top down (keeping careful records for possible reconstruction) and see what it contains.