It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Could Sea Brat Dispersant have worked In The Gulf of Mexico?

page: 3
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 01:47 PM
link   
a reply to: antar
The Eyes Behind is that what its called?



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 03:30 PM
link   
a reply to: jazz10

My signature choice is in honor of a fallen friend. I wear it as a reminder to be "always aware" in all things and never accept anything at face value and most importantly to be fearless in life and never stop looking behind false masks at the truth.

Thank you for asking about a great man who is missed every day by all who knew, loved and respected him.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: antar

And if your frienss focus was that of good he/she will be fine. I dont believe in death as we know it.
Long story I suppose.

By the way thanks........and see.



posted on Oct, 14 2014 @ 03:05 PM
link   
I would like to share sometgingvthat I have just realised......well realised may not be the right word but maybe a coincidence.

Corexit......

Toxicologists: Corexit “Ruptures Red Blood Cells, Causes Internal Bleeding”, “Allows Crude Oil To Penetrate “Into The Cells” and “Every Organ System”

Posted on July 9, 2010 by WashingtonsBlog

As I have previously noted, Corexit is toxic, is less effective than other dispersants, and is actually worsening the damage caused by the oil spill.

Now, two toxicologists are saying that Corexit is much more harmful to human health and marine life than we’ve been told.

Specifically Gulf toxicologist Dr. Susan Shaw – Founder and Director of the Marine Environmental Research Institute – dove into the oil spill to examine the chemicals present.

Dr. Shaw told CNN:

If I can tell you what happens — because I was in the oil — to people…

Shrimpers throwing their nets into water… [then] water from the nets splashed on his skin. …

[He experienced a] headache that lasted 3 weeks… heart palpitations… muscle spasms… bleeding from the rectum…

And that’s what that Corexit does, it ruptures red blood cells, causes internal bleeding, and liver and kidney damage. …

This stuff is so toxic combined… not the oil or dispersants alone. …

Very, very toxic and goes right through skin.

***

The reason this is so toxic is because of these solvents [from dispersant] thatpenetrate the skin of anything that’s going through the dispersed oil takes the oil into the cells — takes the oil into the organs… and this stuff is toxic to every organ system in the body. …

Similarly, marine biologist and toxicologist Dr. Chris Pincetich – who has an extensive background in testing the affects of chemicals on fish – says that Corexit disrupts cell membranes.

He also explains that EPA toxicity testing for Corexit is woefully inadequate, since EPA testing for mortality usually only requires a 96-hour time frame. His doctoral research found that fish that were alive at 96 hours after exposure to pesticide were dead at two weeks, so the chemicals were considered non-lethal for the purposes of the test.

Drs. Shaw and Pincetich are wildlife conservationists. But even industry scientists working forExxon and the manufacturer of Corexit itself admit that the stuff is toxic.



Now if you take into account the symptoms of Corexit and then take into account the symptoms of Ebola it seems quite a coincidence.

So

COREXIT used as a poison to create this Ebola outbreak?

Consumption of corexit laced food would cause similar symptoms perhaps????
Just a thought.

I know I may be wrong ok just thinking out loud.



posted on Apr, 15 2015 @ 02:59 AM
link   
Hello. My father was a captain over the projects for a ship that capped the oil spill and burned off the oil. My husband worked on the same ship on the drilling side. Being an environmental scientist I have an idea of what was happening. The bacteria used also made a decrease in oxygen levels. The Gulf of Mexico every year has a dead zone cause by the run off from the rivers and the cattle and farming near them. The decrease of available oxygen comes from basically eating what they do causes them to take up more dissolved oxygen. So this was made worse by those synthesize bacteria entered in the water to munch up the oil. It's not a great deal but there are pros and cons with everything.



posted on Apr, 15 2015 @ 03:04 AM
link   
I apologize I didn't mean bacteria but enzymes lol it's 4 am so worn out lol




top topics
 
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join