It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by airspoon
If I need antibiotics for instance, I have to pay a government approved doctor, not only for a permission slip to take the medicine, but also for a visit with this doctor.
Well, that's kind of the problem -- how do you know that you need antibiotics?
Originally posted by onthedownlow
Air Spoon makes a very good point. Often times a simple antibiotic can be a life saving remedy, but only liscensed doctors can dole these out.
The most important ways to prevent antibiotic resistance are:
Minimise unnecessary prescribing and overprescribing of antibiotics. This occurs when people expect doctors to prescribe antibiotics for a viral illness (antibiotics do not work against viruses) or when antibiotics are prescribed for conditions that do not require them.
AS is definitely on to something, if doctors had to compete for our patronage the prices would stay down and medical services would be forced to streamline their costs and services.
I am curious, doesn't the government provide affordable insurance at the state level for those who can't afford it?
Originally posted by airspoon
reply to post by adjensen
Well, that's kind of the problem -- how do you know that you need antibiotics?
Well for one, it's nobody's business but my own, as to how I would know that. Second of all, it doesn't take government approval for someone to know when they have an infection, when they have pain or when they have a stomach ache. What you are basically saying is that only Medical Doctors should have knowledge about medicine and that restriction of knowledge should cost everyone who isn't an MD thousands of dollars (even millions over a lifetime).
The point is, is that it is my body. I should not be forced to pay someone in order to keep it healthy or to heel myself. Because this is an absolute needed service, it is in effect a monopoly when their are political laws preventing people from doing it themselves.
And no one says otherwise.
Like I said, you're welcome to treat yourself as you see fit, so long as it doesn't involve dangerous or controlled substances.
Originally posted by airspoon
Like I said, you're welcome to treat yourself as you see fit, so long as it doesn't involve dangerous or controlled substances.
Actually, you aren't allowed to treat yourself as you see fit, though lets just suppose you are. Most medicines are controlled substances, through the DEA classifications I-V (I believe). The point made is obviously lost on you. The fact that I am prohibited from medicating myself, means that I am forced to patronize a government approved doctor, even when the substance, chemical or medicine is easily found in nature. Such an idea is the very anti-thesis of liberty and freedom.
Originally posted by lpowell0627
The ruling should stick simply because the Federal Government had to go to court and argue that this healthcare law falls under the taxing laws and therefore they can mandate it....
I laughed the most when I found out that the Fed's lawyers actually had to argue that it is a tax...
Interestingly enough, this does not nullify the entire thing. Rather, only section 1501 (?) was found to be unconstitutional -- the personal mandate clause.
The only thing left, after going all the way to the Supreme Court with this thing, would be for Obama to create a specific tax that everyone has to pay, and then allocate those funds to pay for his healthcare plan.
Originally posted by MikeNice81
Yeah you know nationalized health care is the best way to do things. Just ask the politicians from Canada, Europe, and all around the word that fly here to get treated. When it comes time for open heart surgery or some new and "experimental" surgery people come here.
How many things does our government do cheaper than private companies?
Originally posted by scoutsniper
You wrote and asked: "How many things does our government do cheaper than private companies?
Any one or any company that is willing to pay $300.00 for a screw driver is "sick".
Answer: "NONE"