It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That this tactic is part of a high-tech terror campaign against Afghan villages and the people who inhabit them is evident even by the descriptions and accounts of western media outlets that are supporting the war.
Originally posted by phatpackage
reply to post by Danbones
Sounds fair & reasonable!. Imagine the outcry if a small child was hurt by an unexploded device. Credit where credit is due The US did the right thing on this one!
hows it fair and resonable. If there was an unexploded device in your house would you like a missle slammed into it or would you like it cleared... These are peoples homes, that dont have insurance and stuff like that, it is a massive blow and wont put the allied forces in a good light.
Originally posted by phatpackage
hows it fair and resonable. If there was an unexploded device in your house would you like a missle slammed into it or would you like it cleared... These are peoples homes, that dont have insurance and stuff like that, it is a massive blow and wont put the allied forces in a good light.
Sounds very fair in that we are sacrificing human lives & spending big dollars to rid these people of oppression. These are people in need & the co-alition is doing their very best to help. In return these people are just asked to help out .... vacating etc !edit on 21-11-2010 by phatpackage because: (no reason given)
I don't recall anyone ever asking us to stick our noses into their business.
well they might be making way for more poppy fields
Originally posted by phatpackage
They didn't we went t here to remove the taliban. The double banger result was helping the locals. The co-alition have nothing to be ashamed of. Sure accidents happen in any military operation but the overall intention was saintly! Hope this answers your question! Cheers