I don't think this is a meeting to destroy the liberal agenda, rather I think it is a meeting to push forward with their own agenda.
Many of these corporations are famous for corrupt policies and ulterior agendas. If I didn't know any better, I would say that many of these companies
plot to "rule the world", such as Bechtel.
John Perkins worked for Bechtel and blew the whistle on their corrupt economic policies of bankrupting third world nations, at least in part for the
CIA, thus causing these nations to either become beholden to US interests for strategic or economic purposes (such as making them give us their vote
in the UN).
Many of these companies are allegedly responsible for the turmoil in the Middle East and Latin America.
Again, I don't think this is a meeting to destroy the liberal agenda, so much as it is a meeting to further their own and rule the world. They are the
I don't think this has anything to do with "conservatism", they just use that term to hide their corrupt policies. If you think about it, they aren't
really even conservative, so much as they are statist. Glenn Beck is famous for being a fake conservative and instead a neo-conservative, as he agreed
with the Bush bailouts, the Patriot Act, the Bush swelling of government and government intrusion into our personal lives. It was only after Americans
voiced their opinion in the '08 elections, that Glenn Beck then turned a complete 180 and pretends to be a conservative libertarian.
You can't be a conservative and champion large government, nor can you be libertarian and champion the government intruding into your personal life.
Nor can you be either one of those and [publicly] condone
the steeling of tax-dollars to hand over to corrupt corporations.
Again, how can this be a meeting to further a conservative agenda if the attendees aren't even conservative. No, instead this a meeting of high
powered neo-cons who are trying to tighten their grip over the world and I bet they are going to use people like Glenn Beck to fool the American
public to go along with it, just as they have done before. Pundits are important to them after all, as they do the thinking for the people.
(visit the link for the full news article)
edit on 20-10-2010 by airspoon because: (no reason given)