It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Court Denies Access to Fannie/Freddie Political Records

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 14 2010 @ 07:34 AM
link   
This is amazing!! Remember that the ONCE private Fannie/Freddie are now under govt. control and are hereby subject FOIA compliance.


Judicial Watch recently suffered a temporary setback in its pursuit of records related to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s political contributions. On September 30, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled, in effect, that the Obama administration may keep the records of these two government-controlled enterprises secret.

Here is the statement I offered to the press in response:

This [ruling] shows that the Obama Administration’s commitment to transparency is a big lie. It is incredible that taxpayers are on the line for at least $400 billion, yet cannot access one document from these agencies under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the Federal Housing Financial Authority (FHFA) to force the agency’s compliance with a FOIA request, which Judicial Watch submitted on May 29, 2009.

According to Judicial Watch’s motion filed on March 5, 2009, Fannie and Freddie are no longer private enterprises, and therefore their records should be subject to FOIA law:

Until they were seized by FHFA in September 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were private corporations with independent directors, officers, and shareholders. Since that time, however, FHFA, a federal agency subject to FOIA, has assumed full legal custody and control of the records of these previously independent entities. Hence, these records are subject to FOIA like any other agency records.


The court agreed in general with the principal arguments but still ruled in favor of the Obama administration.
Really!!

Here is the complicated part. Strap your head down to keep it from spinning.


Now here’s where it gets a bit tricky. The courts have established a four-pronged test to determine whether or not a federal agency has “control” over records:

(1) the intent of the document’s creator to [either] retain or relinquish control over the records; (2) the ability of the agency to use and dispose of the record as it sees fit; (3) the extent to which agency personnel have read or relied upon the document; and (4) the degree to which the document was integrated into the agency’s record system or files.

The Court ruled that the first two factors weigh in favor of Judicial Watch and the latter two weigh in favor of the Obama administration. However, Judge Friedman deemed the latter two factors “most important,” tipping the scale in favor of the government. Ultimately, therefore, the Court ruled FHFA did not control the records, and could therefore continue to keep them secret. I suggest you check out the ruling for yourself, as well as Judicial Watch’s detailed court filings. But we believe, particularly with respect to the fourth factor, there is no question the Fannie and Freddie records were integrated into the agency’s files and are therefore subject to FOIA.

The Court essentially ruled that the records are not public documents because they were created before the government took control of Fannie and Freddie. The Court also ruled that because, supposedly, no one in the Obama administration’s agency “uses” the documents, that they be kept secret from the American people. Respectfully, I’m not persuaded.

Fannie and Freddie used political contributions to protect themselves as they set up the housing market for collapse. Now, as a result, taxpayers are on the hook to Fannie and Freddie for at least $400 billion — and $5 trillion in mortgage liabilities. The Obama administration has taken over the mortgage market through Fannie and Freddie. And not one document from these two monstrosities is subject to disclosure under our open records law? No wonder the Tea Parties are growing. The Obama administration is out of control and argues to courts for radical secrecy and lack of accountability

biggovernment.com...


This is what we are up against everyday!!



posted on Oct, 14 2010 @ 07:43 AM
link   


This [ruling] shows that the Obama Administration’s commitment to transparency is a big lie.


Indeed it is....in the present example or elsewhere.

The only difference between the Obama and Bush administrations is that Bush didn't lie about his intentions with respect to open government.
(Ironically, that may be the only honest thing Bush did.
)



posted on Oct, 14 2010 @ 07:51 AM
link   
Fannie and Freddie are also exempt from the regulations in Obama's new Wall Street Reform.

Meanwhile....


Revenue on Wall Street grew by just 3 percent this year. In the face of small growth and a struggling economy Wall Street is on track to dish out $144 billion to its employees this year. This includes several bonuses. There is an expected pay increase in 26 out of 35 firms. The $144 billion estimate is a 4 percent increase over last year’s figure of $139 billion. Despite a severe scolding from lawmakers over the past year, employee compensation and bonuses still remain a top priority among Wall Street firms.

www.usfinancialpost.com...


Hey, I thought this reform was supposed to pare back this type of excessive compensation for Obama's "fat cats on Wall Street"



posted on Oct, 14 2010 @ 08:29 AM
link   
Does this then mean that any freddie/fannie documents wont be able to be used to prove mortgage ownership and therefore people won't be foreclosed on?



posted on Oct, 14 2010 @ 08:44 AM
link   
reply to post by CitizenNum287119327
 


Good question. Does Fannie/Freddie actually hold the notes on the majority of US mortgages in their possession? We are in for a major housing collapse here. All at the hands of a select few. People are now asking their lenders if they actually hold the physical mortgage note on their homes. If the answer is no, guess who stops making the payments?

Buying home used to be the best investment that you could ever make. False. My home is currently valued $20k below what I payed 6 years ago. Great investment. I'm staying put and will hopefully ride out this mess.

As side note, all of this madness and foreclosure mess has actually caused the property values of responsible homeowners to plummet. I was barely able to refinance to take advantage of the rock bottom rates because of the now low appraisal values. I had to fight for a more favorable appraisal by a second appraisal firm. Mindnumbing!!!!

Let's just all stop making payments. The whole nation will be in default just like our govt. is with their debt holders around the world.



posted on Oct, 14 2010 @ 08:45 AM
link   
reply to post by CitizenNum287119327
 


Exactly..............what's good for the goose is good for the little people. I can't say I'm surprised though, more transparency.



new topics

top topics
 
3

log in

join