Sex, Drugs, and... Depopulation

Sex, Drugs, and... Depopulation
Today's society is being re-engineered and re-programmed by the elite, using a variety of tactics, to carry out the depopulation agenda in order to reduce the world's population to more manageable and controllable numbers. As I will discuss in this thread, these tactics are not shadowy, mysterious, and hidden under a veil of secrecy, but are openly visible and cleverly disguised as liberating social movements.

There are several of these social movements, some of which you yourself may be a willing participant of, that are being controlled and manipulated by the elite for their own interests; not yours. It is not my intention to offend anyone, nor is it my intention to insult or belittle your personal choices and beliefs. My sole intention is to offer my personal perspective on how these social movements are guiding our society to a depopulated world controlled by a single government.

Recreational Sex
From the dramatic and ever-increasing wealth and power of the pornography industry to the use of celebrities in the film and music industries as sexual objects, the popularity of sex has led to a re-programming of society's view of sex as a recreational activity rather than as a reproductive activity.

Birth Control & Abortion
The increase in usage of birth control and abortion is an obvious form of population control due to it's prevention of birth. Many birth control and abortion methods also reduce fertility and increase the chances of miscarriage if or when the mother decides to have a child.

Medications such as RU-486 are owned and sponsored by the Population Council, which was established by John D. Rockefeller III, and whose first president was Frederick Osborn, leader of the American Eugenics Society. In addition to this, there are strong links between the elite and institutions such as Planned Parenthood.

Feminism
Feminism plays an integral part of the depopulation and world government agenda. The feminist movement has long fought for, and been quite successful in, creating a society which supports the woman and oppresses the man. You see this in many aspects of our society. Here are just a few:

• Women are more favored in divorce disputes, especially when involving children.
• Women receive more benefits from social programs than men.
• Women are treated less harshly in the justice system, particularly in domestic disputes and abuse.

Breast Cancer Awareness Month is another example of the feminist society. The constant and deliberate mental pounding we take to support breast cancer awareness and research and to be sympathetic of sufferers and celebrators of survivors is nothing more than a ploy to promote feminism. I do not see this much attention devoted to skin, lung, and prostate cancer, despite these three cancers being more common among the population. Are breast cancer victims somehow more important? Shouldn't all cancer victims receive equal attention and sympathy?

Even in seemingly innocent aspects of society, feminism has asserted itself. Take commercial advertisements, for example: the female is always the dominant, more intelligent, more successful figure; the male is always the ashamed, moronic, and weak figure.

In addition to these, strong evidence exists to support the "conspiracy theory" that women were granted equal rights in the United States and other countries not as a step towards freedom, but as a plot to employ and tax the other half of the population.

Homosexuality
The support of homosexuality has obvious ties to the depopulation agenda for the simple fact that homosexuals cannot reproduce. The openness and acceptance of homosexuality, and the increase in popularity of negative views that heterosexual couples and marriages are unhappy, and that all members of the opposite sex are nothing more than spawns of the Devil, have weakened and deteriorated the prevalence of a romantic bond between men and women.

Connecting the Dots
I chose to mention these four social movements because they all tie together, in one way or another. As has been stated, the culture of sex has shifted from a natural form of reproduction to a recreational activity in which the greater number of "ventures" heightens a person's social status. The increase in instance of sex has both led to an increase in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases as well as an increase in the use of birth control - which, of course, does not prevent sexually transmitted diseases - and abortion. The equal, independent, 21st century feminist woman frequently exercises this equality by practicing recreational sex as frequent, if not more frequent, as men, and this independence by becoming homosexual or abstaining from sexual relations with men altogether. The rise of homosexuality is the result of the combined efforts of the sexual and feminist revolutions.

As can be seen with a bit of research, all four of these aspects of our society are being controlled by the elite to serve their depopulation agenda because all four of these aspects of our society contribute either to the prevention of life or to the ending of life. This is not by accident; this is not a natural change; this is not a change with innocent roots and intentions. This is a change intended to reduce the number of humans on this planet to a number that is sufficient enough to operate a world that supports the wealth and power of an elite few but not sufficient enough for those lucky enough to survive (or unlucky enough, I should say) to stage a revolt.

Disclaimer: The points made in this thread are my personal views. This thread is an opinion and perspective based piece and not meant to represent an in-depth research or study, hence the lack of sources cited. By no means am I claiming these are the only methods being employed by the elite to achieve depopulation. Although it is my opinion that social movements such as abortion, women's rights, and homosexuality are used as tools of the elite to serve their depopulation agenda, I am not against the principles of these social movements, so do not bother accusing me of such. I am simply against the manipulators and their intentions for these social movements.

So basically, there is a huge emphasis on sex. I can see this manifested in lots of ways, as you had stated above, but is its sole purpose for depopulation? I see these as tools to divide. Depopulation through the tactics you had mentioned I think require way too much time to transpire. Homosexuality is in no way going to stop people from breeding. Depopulation will happen more than likely happen through warfare, or some sort of drug/vaccine, IMO.

Originally posted by The Endtime Warrior
Depopulation will happen more than likely happen through warfare, or some sort of drug/vaccine, IMO

By no means am I claiming these are the only methods of depopulation. I completely agree that other methods, such as warfare, disease, and famine, have been, are being, and will continue to be used as methods of depopulation. What I am simply stating in this thread, however, is that these social movements, despite their innocent appearance, have sinister motives and intentions.

reply to post by PETROLCOIN


Ok thanks for the clarification. I believe most of these things aid to the destruction of the family. All of which started before WW2.

A long time ago I began keeping track of Pro NWO and Depopulation comments, and here are a few of the more disturbing ones. Who am I kidding? They're all disturbing, but anywho....



“All we need is the right crisis and the masses will accept the New World Order” -David Rockefeller, who calls himself a “globalist”

George H.W. Bush said in a speech on 9/11 l993 that “The gulf war is the first test of the New World Order.”

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

“The illegal, we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.” -Dr. Henry Kissinger New York Times, Oct. 28, 1973

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” -David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

In a recent speech at TED, Bill Gates, stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion & sterilization), we could lower that by perhaps 10-15%.”

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”. -Dr. Henry Kissinger

“World population needs to be decreased by 50-70%” -Dr. Henry Kissinger

“The elderly are useless eaters” -Dr. Henry Kissinger

“War and famine would not do. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved. AIDS is not an efficient killer because it is too slow. My favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s population is airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. We’ve got airborne diseases with 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that. You know, the bird flu’s good, too. For everyone who survives, he will have to bury nine” - Dr. Eric Pianka University of Texas (Pianka is an evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert, who revealed solutions for reducing the world’s population to an audience on population control. He received a standing ovation.)

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.” Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER

Originally posted by PETROLCOIN

Homosexuality
The support of homosexuality has obvious ties to the depopulation agenda for the simple fact that homosexuals cannot reproduce. The openness and acceptance of homosexuality, and the increase in popularity of negative views that heterosexual couples and marriages are unhappy, and that all members of the opposite sex are nothing more than spawns of the Devil, have weakened and deteriorated the prevalence of a romantic bond between men and women.

So I guess that it couldn't simply be because it is 2010, and locking people up or condamning them only becuase of their sexual orientations, is getting old.

Not to mention that you obviously completely forgot about the existence of Bisexuals, that can have any relation with any gender they wish.

So "they" can't reproduce, huh? Darn, I wonder what that old English military guy that circulated in the news some years ago- what ever his name was- would have to say about that claim, considering that he parented 9 biological children before he did a sex change.

Originally posted by Nightchild
So I guess that it couldn't simply be because it is 2010, and locking people up or condamning them only becuase of their sexual orientations, is getting old.

It appears as though you did not read my disclaimer. The purpose of the disclaimer was to preempt posts like yours which attack me for bringing up the homosexuality movement.

As was stated in my disclaimer, I am not against homosexuality. I am strongly for it. I am also not claiming that this social movement would have never happened had it not been for the elite. But what I AM claiming is that they are controlling and manipulating it for their own purposes, not because condemning people for their sexual orientation is wrong.

Originally posted by PETROLCOIN

Originally posted by Nightchild
So I guess that it couldn't simply be because it is 2010, and locking people up or condamning them only becuase of their sexual orientations, is getting old.

It appears as though you did not read my disclaimer. The purpose of the disclaimer was to preempt posts like yours which attack me for bringing up the homosexuality movement.

As was stated in my disclaimer, I am not against homosexuality. I am strongly for it. I am also not claiming that this social movement would have never happened had it not been for the elite. But what I AM claiming is that they are controlling and manipulating it for their own purposes, not because condemning people for their sexual orientation is wrong.

Some people never read the whole thread, but I don't believe homosexuality is a part of the NWO depopulation contingency. I could be wrong though. It's known that greenhouse gasses from landfills and dumps causes homosexuality in lab rats, and if you look through civilization and throughout history it seems to be supported. Rome, Manhattan, London, as well as other large cities seem to have the highest numbers in homosexuality. In smaller towns with factory greenhouse gasses, more numbers go up.

While I'm sure there are some forms of homosexuality that are "normal", its impossible to argue with the numbers and science that support the theories behind the connection of noxious gasses and being gay.
[My brother-in-law, who is gay, was very angry when he read the article showing these results, and stated that in the small town that he grew up in, there were no landfills or factories. After I showed him the paper treatment plant that was less than a mile from the home he grew up in, he got very calm and quiet, and now he too thinks there may be a connection.] People hate to find out that their lifestyle is beyond their control. As they say, the truth hurts, but it doesn't make them inhuman. I love my gay brother-in-law more than my straight. He's a great guy. I hope I haven't offended anyone with this comment. I'm just going off the science.

reply to post by Mactire


I'd be very interested in seeing this study. I searched for it, but didn't find anything. Would you mind providing a link please?

reply to post by Epiphron


Yeah, give me a little while to find it online. This was from some science magazine a few years ago (I know, I know. Print is dead. This wasn't the case when I read the article though). I thought the ATS crowd would've already covered this subject years ago. Just give me time to rediscover the article online.


I found a bunch of reports about Methane gas being linked to homosexuality in fruit-fly studies, but not the mice report I read mentioning different emitters and different gases. I'll keep looking.

reply to post by PETROLCOIN

In addition to these, strong evidence exists to support the "conspiracy theory" that women were granted equal rights in the United States and other countries not as a step towards freedom, but as a plot to employ and tax the other half of the population.

I can not find the actual quote (I have looked several times) but a few years ago I ran across a quote from David Rockefeller that stated exactly that. "Equal rights" was about more tax wealth flowing into the pockets of the bankers. As I showed in another thread 100% of our personal tax ends up in the pockets of the bankers. So does the money "borrowed" to buy a house or used on credit cards.

Testimony by Mr. Morgan, the bank’s president,First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969)
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, . . . did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. Web of Debt

Depopulation is very definitely alive and well in the USA. I have done a bit of research on the subject.

Here is my contribution:

Implications of Worldwide Population Growth
For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests
(THE KISSINGER REPORT)
December 10, 1974
www.lifesitenews.com...

Central Intelligence Agency: Birth rates by country: www.cia.gov...

And the subject would not be complete with out this reference to depopulation and de-industrialization:
John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet "Book he authored in 1977 advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population" zombietime.com...


Dark Chapter of American History:

U.S. Court Battle Over Forced Sterilization
In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of Virginia's sterilization law. This was followed by a swift rise in the number of forced sterilizations in the United States.
www.commondreams.org...

Forced Sterilization of women in the USA continued into the 1970's

No one even today knows exactly how many Native American women were sterilized during the 1970s. One base for calculation is provided by the General Accounting Office, whose study covered only four of twelve IHS regions over four years (1973 through 1976). Within those limits, 3,406 Indian women were sterilized, according to the GAO. www.ratical.com...

USDA funds Spermicidal Corn in 2001 This one is very scary. I live in North Carolina and my goat herd quit producing babies after I fed them whole corn during the drought a few years ago (FOUR different billies and twenty nannies and I got three or four babies the last couple of years instead of the usual 25 )

A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile. At the time Epicyte had a joint venture agreement to spread its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was since acquired by a North Carolina biotech company. Astonishing to learn was that Epicyte had developed its spermicidal GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same USDA which, despite worldwide opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, now held by Monsanto. noblelie.com...

Vaccines:   Sterilisation & Abortion
A listing of covert sterilizations around the world www.whale.to...
and www.academon.com...

BOOK: Demographic Changes in Sub-Saharan Africa

However, until the late 1980s there was little evidence of any change in fertility. Since then, many changes have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa. Although population growth rates remain high, signs of reductions in fertility are appearing in several populations once regarded as having little or no prospect of lower levels of reproduction in the short term...

Barney Cohen reviews levels, differentials, and trends in fertility for more than 30 countries from 1960 to 1992. He finds evidence of fertility decline in Botswana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe, confirming the basic results of the DHS. What is new here though is his finding that the fertility decline appears to have occurred across cohorts of women at all parities, rather than just among women at middle and higher parities, as might have been expected on the basis of experience in other parts of the world. He also presents evidence that fertility may have begun to fall in parts of Nigeria and possibly in Senegal.
www.nap.edu...

From The Bomb that Fizzled

“now, mounting evidence, from rich nations and poor, strongly suggests that the population explosion is fizzling. Earlier this month, for the first time ever, the United Nations Population Division convened expert demographers to consider aspects of low and tumbling fertility rates. That discussion is a step toward a near-Copernican shift in the way our species looks at itself. Never before have birthrates fallen so far, so fast, so low, for so long all around the world….

The free-fall in fertility can best be seen in World Population Prospects: The 1996 Revision, an eye-opening reference book published by the United Nations, from which most data used here are drawn. From 1950 to 1955, the global “total fertility rate” (roughly speaking, the average number of children born per woman per lifetime) was five. That was explosively above the so-called replacement rate of 2.1 children, the level needed to keep a population from falling over time, absent immigration. This scary growth continued for about 15 years until, by 1975 to 1980, fertility had fallen to four children per woman. Fifteen years after that, the rate had fallen to just below three. Today the total fertility rate is estimated at 2.8, and sinking.” www.pop.org...

There is just too much information out there confirming "official" attempts to cut population growth. Given the "high fructose" corn syrup in all our soft drinks and other packaged foods, the spermicidal corn is especially scary. Corn is wind pollenated and the pollen can travel many many miles on the wind. Mexico had a ban on GMO corn but testing has shown the native veriaties are cross contaminated with GMO genetics.

A recent study published in Nature by University of California Berkeley researchers reveals that some of Mexico’s native corn varieties contain genetically modified, or transgenic, DNA....

The Mexican government’s own findings reveal that three to 10 per cent of the Sierra Norte corn contains transgenic DNA. What is confounding is that the closest recorded plantings of bioengineered maize were 100 kilometres (60 miles) away from the Sierra Norte de Oaxaca. Researchers suspect that the contamination occurred as a result of multiple pollinations over time...

The StarLink scandal provides an interesting example of how the US regulatory system was unable to prevent an unapproved transgenic corn variety from entering the food system. In August 2000, Friends of the Earth in the United States commissioned the testing of Taco Bell taco shells made by Kraft Foods for possible genetic contamination. Tests showed the presence of the Cry9C gene used in the StarLink corn variety engineered to resist insects and unapproved for human consumption due to potential allergenicity. Even though StarLink represents 0.4 per cent of US corn acreage, the contamination problem was extensive. The presence of Cry9C in more than 80 varieties of yellow corn seed and in some white corn varieties made StarLink the largest reported case of GMO contamination in the world. www.alive.com...

Now go enjoy a nice snack of corn taco chips and a cola.....

I wish to retract my previous statement about the link between Homosexuality and Greenhouse gases. I was unable to find a link to prove this info, as the article I remembered reading was over a decade old. Since I can't provide reflective info, I feel the info I provided can't be construed as testimony. I'm apologizing on my own behalf for the lack of proof. If I ever do find the article, I'll be sure to post it.

Originally posted by crimvelvet
I can not find the actual quote (I have looked several times) but a few years ago I ran across a quote from David Rockefeller that stated exactly that. "Equal rights" was about more tax wealth flowing into the pockets of the bankers.

It was covered in Aaron Russo's "America: Freedom to Fascism" documentary. That is the only place I've seen it. But it's logical and Aaron Russo didn't seem like the type to lie or exaggerate.

Testimony by Mr. Morgan, the bank’s president,First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969)
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, . . . did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. Web of Debt

Originally posted by crimvelvet
John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet

Exactly. That should be a big clue for everyone about this administration.

People should also research Rahm Emanuel and his brother Ezekiel Emanuel.

I'll end this post with a quote from Prince Philip:

"If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels."

These people want us dead. Plain and simple.

Here are a few more depopulation quotes:

“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine

“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.”
Stanford Professor ” Paul Ehrlich in The Population Bomb

“I believe that human overpopulation is the fundamental problem on Earth Today” and, “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”
Dave Foreman, Sierra Club and co founder of Earth First!

“In South America, the government of Peru goes door to door pressuring women to be sterilized and they are funded by American tax dollars to do this.”
Mark Earley in The Wrong Kind of Party Christian Post 10/27 2008

"Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”
Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones

“Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club

“The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.”
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Obama’s Science czar John P. Holdren: From a book he helped write ‘Ecoscience’

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”
Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviet Union

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.”
-John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.” - Margaret Sanger

“And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.” - The Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, p. 60, Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz

and lastly...

“I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.”

Bertrand Russell (1872-1970), Philosopher

There have always been people who have wanted great numbers to die for the "betterment" of human society. Are they correct in their ideals? I am not a judge of mankind. The truth is there are large bunkers in this country being built with entry ways that are able to be sealed from both ends. These "pressure chambers", though completely made of stone and concrete, are rigged with overhead sprinkler systems, kind of like the hose down clean rooms used in CDC labs. War hasn't worked, sterilization hasn't worked, everyone knows that our numbers will be at over 7 billion by 2012, and by the time we reach 9 billion it'll be too late, the governments here and abroad are getting desperate.

reply to post by PETROLCOIN

These people want us dead. Plain and simple.

That is for sure. They only want enough people around to make life easy for them. The rest are "useless eaters" using up resources they want to save for THEIR children.

Have you ever looked at the "Wildlands Project" MAP? That was one very scary project that almost got passed into law!

The Wildlands Project would set up to one-half of America into core wilderness reserves and interconnecting corridors (red), all surrounded by interconnecting buffer zones (yellow). No human activity would be permitted in the red, and only highly regulated activity would be permitted in the yellow areas. Four concerned conservative activists who now make up the board of Sovereignty International were able to find UN documentation that proved the Wildlands Project concept was to provide the basis for the UN Convention on Biological Diversity. They used this information and this map produced by Dr. Michael Coffman, editor of Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes and CEO of Sovereignty International, to stop the ratification of the treaty an hour before its scheduled cloture and ratification vote. (See Congressional Record S13790)
Source

This defeat is only temporary. The project is still alive and well.

There are already too many people living on Planet Earth, according to one of most influential science advisors in the US government.

Nina Fedoroff told the BBC One Planet programme that humans had exceeded the Earth's "limits of sustainability".

Dr Fedoroff has been the science and technology advisor to the US secretary of state since 2007, initially working with Condoleezza Rice.

...the planet can't support many more people," Dr Fedoroff said, stressing the need for humans to become much better at managing "wild lands"..... Pressed on whether she thought the world population was simply too high, Dr Fedoroff replied: "There are probably already too many people on the planet."

Under the new Obama administration, she now advises Hillary Clinton. BBC

There you have it from direct a science and technology adviser to both Bush and Obama.

"There are probably already too many people on the planet."


Combine that with the views of John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and President Barack Obama’s top science adviser

In their 1973 book “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions,” Holdren and co-authors Paul and Anne Ehrlich wrote:

“A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation. Resources and energy must be diverted from frivolous and wasteful uses in overdeveloped countries to filling the genuine needs of underdeveloped countries."

“The need for de-development presents our economists with a major challenge,” they wrote. “They must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth than the present one. Redistribution of wealth both within and among nations is absolutely essential, if a decent life is to be provided for every human being.”

Do not make the mistake of think the politicians have not been taking Holdren seriously because the actual data shows they have. In 1970, according to the US Census, 24% of the US labor force was engaged in manufacturing, as of June 2010 only 7.58% of the labor force was manufacturing goods, that is creating actual wealth, or real products.


The quote for the definition of "human" is even more chilling:

In the same book, Holdren and his co-authors made this observation about when a fetus becomes a human being:

“The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being. Where any of these essential elements is lacking, the resultant individual will be deficient in some respect.”

Now consider the drive to have babies DNA tested at birth.....

"[N]ewborn screening is the largest genetic testing effort in the nation and is primarily performed by state public health laboratories."


... millions of newborn babies, hospitals have stored their DNA, taking blood samples in heel-prick tests to screen for serious conditions, and which held for years by some hospitals, can subsequently be accessed by the police to identify involvement in crimes. The fact that coroners and medical researchers will be allowed to use the samples for a variety of purposes, has raised concerns over the backdoor creation of a national DNA database.

After Laboratory Tests are Conducted, Newborn Screening Cards are Saved for Research

For decades, pathologists and clinical laboratory scientists have been part of a seemingly innocuous public health practice begun in the 1960s: newborn blood testing. Now, because of recent advances in genetic tests and molecular diagnostics, growing numbers of parents are concerned about how the government handles the DNA of their newborn babies....

These cards contain the samples used to perform laboratory tests required by law to screen newborn infants for a number of devastating genetic diseases...

Parents Outraged at Warehousing of DNA Saved from Newborn Baby Screening Programs and Used for Clinical Laboratory Testing

The DNA of virtually every newborn in the United States is collected, usually via a blood sample taken from a prick to the baby’s heel, and tested for certain genetic and other disorders. Many states view this newborn screening as so important, they don’t require medical personnel to get parents’ express permission before carrying it out.... Source

Sure looks like the USA now has close to complete data base of US citizens DNA. I wonder exactly what that data base will be used for in the future - licensing for producing children???

If you think this is some far out conspiracy than you had better read up on what Maurice Strong of the UN Commission on Global Governance has to say in 1972:

In 1972, as Strong organized the first environmental conference for the UN, he granted an interview to the BBC.
"I am convinced the prophets of doom have to be taken seriously," he said. The only way to avoid doomsday, said Strong, was if "man, in light of this evidence, is going to be wise enough and enlightened enough to subject himself to this kind of discipline and control."

That discipline and control, of course, would be meted out by supernational organizations such as the UN. Just like his interview at Davos, Strong warmed to his topic.

The BBC reporter asked him what discipline and control people could expect - would it include legal limits on the number of children that a family could have?

Strong explained: "Licences to have babies incidentally is something that I got in trouble for some years ago for suggesting even in Canada that this might be necessary at some point, at least some restriction on the right to have a child."

But, if the world didn't follow his instructions - if governments didn't heed the warnings of the doomsayers - then "this is one of the possible courses that society would have to seriously consider." Strong himself has five children.

Do not make the mistake of think it can not happen in the USA. It already has.
Dark Chapter of American History: U.S. Court Battle Over Forced Sterilization

In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of Virginia's sterilization law. This was followed by a swift rise in the number of forced sterilizations in the United States.

reply to post by crimvelvet


The elite have been saying it for decades, if not hundreds of years. It is my personal belief that this has been a plan for thousands of years. There has always been a small group of elitists who strove to dominate the world and their plan has been in practice ever since. All the world's major events have played a role in furthering their agenda, whether they planned the event or not, because even if they don't plan the event they find a way to manipulate it for their own purposes (example: women's rights movement).

Everything that happens in the world may be a shock or surprise to us, but it is not to them. We are not in the know. We are not in control. "Freedom of the Press" and "Government of the people, by the people, and for the people" are nothing but talking points meant to give us the illusion of power... We have no power, we have had no power for a while now, and we will not have power until we take it by force, because force is what these people are using against us.

People blow off all these quotes by the Rockefellers or Holdren or Kissinger as them just exercising their rights to freedom of speech (which is brutally ironic), but that's not what's going on. Yes, it is their opinion. But that's not why they're saying it in public. They're saying it in public to condition us and to warn us... yes, warn us. Not because they care, but because they get off on the fact that they can reveal their plans and hide them in plain sight and we do NOTHING to stop them. They see us as pawns that can be sacrificed, but their Luciferian religion requires them to give us foreknowledge of our impending and inevitable deaths.

These people need to be stopped, otherwise the majority of us will soon be dead. We outnumber them more than 6 million times over, so the solution to this problem is a very simple one and I am a strong advocate of it, as displayed by the image in my signature.

Interesting post BUT the world is NOT depopulating as the the third world and Asian country's are still exploding and then immigrating to Europe and America so i don't think depopulation is a main NWO agenda yet, i think they are still trying to wipe out all sense of patriotism and culture so people would accept the one world government easier. But they could be trying to start civil wars also by trying to destroy patriotism etc. for depopulation.

reply to post by PETROLCOIN


I wholeheartedly support the NWO's efforts in depopulating the planet. It will give me more room to breathe...and that ranks higher than any other complaints I'm seeing here.

Not only is it more manageable, but it also eases the desperation among nations to scour for resources, even if it leads to war. There will be less famine, less pollution, and less starvation. What boggles the mind is why anyone would be against it. G-----d bless the NWO.

Originally posted by BarmyBilly
Interesting post BUT the world is NOT depopulating

I did not say it was depopulating. I did not say that population levels were on the decline.

I said that these aspects of our society are a part of their depopulation agenda. There's a difference.

Originally posted by laiguana
I wholeheartedly support the NWO's efforts in depopulating the planet. It will give me more room to breathe...and that ranks higher than any other complaints I'm seeing here.

Do you truly believe simply pledging your support to their genocide on an Internet forum will spare you and grant you access into their inner circle? What makes you so special that you think you will not be one of the many statistics in their depopulation of the Earth? Furthermore, if (or should I say when) you are one of the statistics, would your stance remain the same?

See that is the problem with people like you. You post mindless drivel on the Internet to get a rise out of all that oppose you without putting any logic into what you are saying. You claim you support the depopulation agenda, but what you really mean is you support the depopulation agenda so long as it does not include yourself, your family, or your close friends.

That, my friend, is hypocrisy and ignorance. Not a very good combination.