It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is he running for 2012?

page: 2
1
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by whatukno
 


Agree there!

He's definitely the best during my lifetime, mind you I don't have too many to chose from.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 03:28 AM
link   
Clinton screwed up now and then, but you never questioned that his intentions were always on the table for the people.. Both sides sort of agreed with that (didn't stop the right from calling him a socialist of course, but hell, they were considered fringe..now they are called the mainstream talking point).

Not sure if I would want Clinton back as POTUS however...I think his most powerful days are behind him in regards of will to be a president...he just wants to be a philanthropist now I reckon...do some speeches, get paid...ultimately have no major responsibilities beyond attending the sunday barbecue.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Bicent76
 


No probs, back on topic...

How could the US taxpayers trust someone who would lie about such a little thing??



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 03:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by CynicalM
reply to post by Bicent76
 


No probs, back on topic...

How could the US taxpayers trust someone who would lie about such a little thing??


Meh...everyone lies about blow jobs. I lie about them all the time.

Trifles, dear. Trifles.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 03:33 AM
link   
reply to post by CynicalM
 


I suppose his 8 years in office previously is not a perk for running a country, why question the how he does things..

I think what happened to him, put him in a position where he had to lie, or where he thought he had to, about a personal mistake he made... I do not think that has anything to do with how he ran our country. History reflects that opinion..


edit on 20-9-2010 by Bicent76 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 03:41 AM
link   
Besides, isn't fooling around a tradition within American presidents?

It's a rite of passage! All of the greats do it!



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 03:48 AM
link   
reply to post by MeSoCorny
 


True, but most do it outside the Oval Office...

Cleaning staff hate that, worse than a 1/2 star hotel..



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 03:52 AM
link   
reply to post by CynicalM
 


I guess you are right. I mean, it IS all about location, location, location. But the cleaning people at the white house are used to that sort of thing, being a 2 star and all...so they won't mind. I can't imagine what they find under those beds.

Perhaps they should just do it on the front lawn from now on.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 04:03 AM
link   
reply to post by MeSoCorny
 


You really need to stay on topic....

Anyways, Hilary could run and Bill could be the "first gentleman"

Almost a defact President...



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 04:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by CynicalM
reply to post by MeSoCorny
 


You really need to stay on topic....

Anyways, Hilary could run and Bill could be the "first gentleman"

Almost a defact President...



Yes that is a possibility. Do you think she will run in 2016?



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 04:08 AM
link   
reply to post by CynicalM
 


YOU are the one who started the off topicness. So you can stuff it.

If Hilary was president I highly doubt she'd let Bill call the shots, although I wouldn't mind.

Irregardless of who the president is the same agenda will be pushed so it really doesn't matter.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 04:13 AM
link   
reply to post by MeSoCorny
 



YOU are the one who started the off topicness. So you can stuff it


Bit harsh, and I didn't..



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 08:53 AM
link   
Yeah, gotta love those two FREE TRADE agreements he signed into being. What were they again? Oh yeah, GATT and NAFTA.

Yep, whole lotta selective memory going on.


I suppose you guys are all for the Clinton Global Initiative too huh?

Funny how here on a conspiracy site, we have people backing a Globalist.

Wonder how many Bilderburgers will be at the Clinton Global Inititive? Do you think Bush faction will be their holding hands with the Clinton faction? I think so.

Hey, where is that sand for me to bury my head in?



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 09:49 AM
link   
Clinton was impeached but not convicted by the Senate. The two term limitation came from FDR's presidency not Reagans. When FDR won a 4th term the republicans went insane and railroaded the 2 term limitation through.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 09:55 AM
link   
Clinton is just another puppet of tptb...



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   
Dear Sweet Feathery Pickle Sticks,

Clinton?, nothing more than a pleasing distraction and a cookie with some milk to keep the focus off the advancement of the shared agenda the last string of presidents work so very hard to make real for their true corporate bosses.
Clinton? Just a nice period of time, a breather, while the lube was being warmed and applied and nobody seemed to notice or care.

en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 11:35 AM
link   
reply to post by damwel
 


Railroaded?

Are you kidding me.

Everyone was afraid to let in another dictator like Roosevelt. Funny how the progressives always love dictatorships. They love how Mao instituted his great society. Listen to how they think that the killing and forced starvation of 60+ million people was for the benefit of the collective.

Not surprising, but funny.

Kind of the projection type thing you know. They warn against people that want freedom of the individual and warn they are going to force something, yet they force EVERYONE to their Machiavellian ways.




edit on 20-9-2010 by saltheart foamfollower because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 11:53 AM
link   
You will see Bill more and more in the upcoming years running up to 2012. He is stumping for his wife, Hillary.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 11:54 AM
link   
Once Presidents are EX-Presidents, they tend to moderate and be freer in commenting on what they really think. Hence, they seem to make more sense. They are not beholden to the same forces they are subject to while still in the game.
Clinton has gone a bit further than most ex-presidents though in commenting on the current administration (whether it was Bush or the current president). Mostly they try to stay out of directly commenting on the guy who currently has the job. He's been very outspoken. And it's curious that he's been most critical (as has Carville) of Obama. More than he ever was with George W... Maybe it's cuz Hillary hates him so much, I don't know, but it is different.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 12:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Bicent76
 


Doesn't matter who's in.

if Clinton was in now he would be doing exactly the same as Obama

"By the time you become the leader of a country, someone else makes all the decisions. You may find you can get away with Virtual Presidents, Virtual Prime Ministers, and Virtual Everything". – Bill Clinton

its the nightmare situation we find ourselves in.

Said a billion times before the last free President America had was shot in the head many many years ago

just my opinion , whats yours ?







 
1
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join