It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It takes some time, but when one is paying enough attention, it eventually becomes obvious the "Truth Movement" is managed from the top, with a nationally organized central "Headquarters". Yes, a southern organizer one time "slipped" and used that word in referring to her 9-11 Truth organizational contact to whom she reported. Thus, the kind of headquarters we're talking about is not one you could visit, but rather... some sort of Spook Central with armed MPs out front.
These 9-11 Truth conversations were nothing if not predictable. Without exception, no organizer would ever (as in never) venture to share other, alternative, thermite-free theories. One time, a group leader became more than a bit distressed when I kept trying to chat about other plausible (i.e., non-thermite) ideas. I can still recall the pained expression on his face when he tried his best to be patient and diplomatically agree with one of my points: "Yes, all that talk about missiles at the World Trade Center is a really interesting theory, sure, and I tend to personally believe it might be true. But..." (and then he moved towards me, and whispered, as if about to share some top secret insider knowledge) "if we talk about these things, we will lose credibility and hurt The Movement. So let's just try at first to stick to safe things - things people will understand."
I wish I had a dollar for every Truth agent who admonished us not to “hurt the Movement”. This slippery agent out of Miami brought condescension to a whole new level of low by implying that preserving “the Movement” is more important than discovering exactly what went down. Thoughts of Jack Nicholson in the courtroom sprang to mind as he bellowed at Tom Cruise: "You can't handle the truth!"
Fascinating research has also been brought to us courtesy of Dr. Wood involving Hurricane Erin. Traveling up the Atlantic coast since September 1, 2001 and becoming closest to New York City's twin towers on September 11, 2001, Erin was tracked in an experiment conducted by NOAA (National Oceanic and Administrative Administration) and a NASA satellite "spacecraft"- outside the awareness of the American public.
Perhaps equally as fascinating? The Langley Research Center recorded Hurricane Erin taking a sharp turn away from the Big Apple, according to their experts at NASA's spy facility. Some may call this an amazing coincidence. Others may want to read about the various roles played by satellites. Hint: They can do more than track storms.
Someone please tell me this. Since when do the weather people ever fail to tell us when a hurricane is headed for the US coast? And when in the world have they ever failed to tell us when a hurricane is heading straight for the Big Apple, particularly since New York City is not exactly a place where hurricanes normally strike? And why is it that Dr. Judy Wood, an unpaid independent researcher, picked up on Erin - and the space experiment taking place that day in a satellite over the Atlantic off the NYC coast when no one on the morning TV news stations did?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
when the 9/11 truth movement is making strides, showing new videos and evidence,
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
The truther vs. the debunker debate was probably artificially engineered by the same interests to further prevent the gullible moronic public from uncovering the actual facts about 9/11 (just like the Republican vs. Democratic thing is controlled by the same people). When you see so called "truthers" using the same closed-minded tactics as debunkers (ridicule, insults, censorship, etc.), you know something is up.
So far, the strategy has worked like a charm for nine years.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Ah, a freelance, pro-Judy Wood article in a publication that nobody has ever heard of before?
Here's an article about how Judy Wood and the no-planers are disinfo artists doing everything they can to damage the credibility of the 9/11 truth movement:
On Disinformation and Damaging Associations
Judy Wood's "work" has been thoroughly debunked in the following papers and articles:
Solving The Great Steel Caper: DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence
Supplemental: DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence
The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center
A study of some issues raised in a paper by Wood & Reynolds
On a side note, has anyone ever noticed that when the 9/11 truth movement is making strides, showing new videos and evidence, that the disinfo artists like Judy Wood and the no-planers have to come out and play to try to discredit the 9/11 truth movement? This thread is just one attempt, albeit a failed one.