It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by ANOK
That was actually not the tower I was referring to when I made my comment. That one though did have part of the tower standing for a moment after the collapse.
Originally posted by Segador
Can anyone prove that there were explosives in the tower?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by BAZ752
I merely questioned that there must surely be other possibilities that _BoneZ_ should be prepared to accept not just those that are apparent ''facts'' to him or her.
There's only one possible way that three WTC buildings could have came down and that is with explosives, based on all available evidence. That's why so many (1200+) architects and engineers have banded together; so many scientists, scholars, and PhD's have banded together; and have came out and said that their research and education have also told them that the only way three WTC buildings could have came down is with explosives.
I do hope that one day you will have a little more free time to take a look at the evidence for yourself.
[edit on 7-9-2010 by _BoneZ_]
Originally posted by Varemia
Here are a couple videos. The first shows two skyscrapers being demolished from a distance. Even over the music, a person can easily make out the massive sounds of crashing from the building and the striking similarity to the WTC collapses:
www.youtube.com...
The second one here shows a shorter skyscraper with the same concept. It demonstrates how a building can be taken down from the top down:
www.youtube.com...
And then for anyone who wants a serious and scientific examination of how and why this happens, here is a PDF that includes the math and everything for the collapse situation:
www.civil.northwestern.edu...
Please review this with civility and let me know what you think. I would like to see how this can be argued away by truthers.
Originally posted by Nomad451
reply to post by seedofchucky
Whats interesting about this is that there were reliable reports of the basement of the first tower exploding and blowing up moments before the plane struck high above.
A janitor gives a compelling story of this happening, which if true indicates there was a deliberate weakening of the lower structure to enable the gravity fueled collapse. I haven't watched the whole video maybe this is mentioned in it, if it isn't then it's something to think about
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by psikeyhackr
It's never been used or even tested on a steel-framed tube-in-tube (need that too, remember) building. That's why there's so much problem with a lot of what is said here. The entire point was that a building can begin a collapse after the destruction of a single floor. What would happen in a steel tube-in-tube building as opposed to a concrete infrastructure is the big question. Someone needs to run tests on this, and remember, we're not talking about traditional steel structures. Those would react VERY differently than the trade centers did.
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by psikeyhackr
It's never been used or even tested on a steel-framed tube-in-tube (need that too, remember) building. That's why there's so much problem with a lot of what is said here. The entire point was that a building can begin a collapse after the destruction of a single floor. What would happen in a steel tube-in-tube building as opposed to a concrete infrastructure is the big question. Someone needs to run tests on this, and remember, we're not talking about traditional steel structures. Those would react VERY differently than the trade centers did.
Is there some reason that the CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM would not apply to a tube-in-tube skyscraper? So why isn't EVERYBODY demanding accurate information on the distributions of steel and concrete in the WTC? Why is this Verinage crap more important then that?
It is possible to create experiments of collapses.
www.youtube.com...
I could easily change the number of washers that I raised and dropped on the rest. Our GREAT engineering schools that charge $100,000+ for FOUR YEARS OF EDUCATION should be able to afford to make models much better than mine. 10 oz washers would allow a much more precise distribution of support strength. Too many of my levels have the same paper loops. It is certainly curious that none of our engineering schools have managed to do this in NINE YEARS.
psik
Originally posted by Varemia
Yes, conservation of momentum does behave differently with different material composition and energies. With a concrete infrastructure, you have a very "block hits block" set of energy interactions, and conservation of momentum plays well. In cases like a steel tube-in-tube with concrete in-between structure, it is very much not block hits block, since the entire energy of the tower is not concentrating on the floor below evenly or completely. Unlike a block system, the steel will toss around and maintain its weight as well as build up some extra kinetic energy (hence, the ejections from extra energy). Essentially, since the floors below cannot even hold up the non-vertically resisted debris if it wasn't falling, it would collapse very quickly without any appearance of resistance to the naked eye. The simple fact is that the tower's horizontal trusses were not designed to take vertical load.
I have never even seen the layout of the beams specified and if it was the same on every level. Since the elevator shafts were different lengths there could have been horizontal beams in places on some levels where they could not have been on others.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by psikeyhackr
I have never even seen the layout of the beams specified and if it was the same on every level. Since the elevator shafts were different lengths there could have been horizontal beams in places on some levels where they could not have been on others.
You really, really should read the NIST report on the towers.