Alethea:
"No. A passenger should not have the right to drink in the vehicle even if it is being operated by someone else.
Some people get testy or violent when drinking and could become argumentative. This in turn could cause distraction of the driver.
Some people puke when drinking. This also could cause a distraction to driver.
Should driver get pulled over for any reason, it could be questionable as to whether he is guilty by association. A "friend" would not put a
"friend" in this kind of jeopardy.
A drinking passenger could become unruly and exhibit behavior that could cause harm to others or to self."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent point! thank you for bringing that up
I will let Spikeys comment be my response as to not take undue credit:
_______________________________________________________
spikey:
"Within a moving vehicle, the only real consideration as far as the law goes should be whether or not the driver/operator of the vehicle is drunk (or
drinking alcohol) or not.
Put it this way, if your boss picked you up from a bar you'd been at, and you were nine sheets to the wind (English expression, meaning drunk as a
skunk), he could quite legally take you home in his car yeah?
So what difference does it make if you are drunk as a skunk AS you get into the car, or get that way AFTER you get in? Drunk is drunk. "
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I do understand that there are "mean drunks" i have met many, and before my switch to the "only beer rule" I may have been considered one.
The instance i originally gave was not that of the passenger (me) being three sheets to the wind, but of the "average joe", if you will, who has a
beer or two after work.
I was hesitant to actually make this thread, but I am glad that I did now, Its always good to see others peoples views even if they dont agree
~meathead