It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jazzyguy
The problem is even more fundamental than that. People with two completely different visions, should not coexist too closely with each other. The solution is the two, the pro-government vs the anarchist, need to be separated once and for all. Let them both find their own path after that.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
It would be a fun experiment, but I honestly think an anarchy would result in a government once a handful of people accumulated enough wealth and sought to keep it.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
This is especially true in a democracy, where by the time you make it to the top, in order to not have already committed political suicide you've already sold your soul a hundred times over.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by eNumbra
Gold doesn't have an intrinsic value either.. it's accepted because people believe it's worth something (gasp!) just like ... fiat (which means Command) money........
I agree with the OP .. the problem has nothing to do with "what" our money is, but how it's used and for what purposes.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I would love to have a go at anarchy on a modest-sized piece of arable land.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I would love to have a go at anarchy on a modest-sized piece of arable land.
Please define "anarchy" as you understand the term.
Does it mean no government and no taxes? No courts? No laws?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
In an anarchy, every family for themselves?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Who would build the roads? How about traffic lights?
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
reply to post by Jazzyguy
The jungle eventually settles into equilibrium. Out of chaos order is born.
I'd just love to give it a shot, and it's not me but governments holding me back, and that's all I wanted to point out in that post.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I came across this article by checking Max Keiser's website.
The problem isn’t that our money isn’t gold-backed. The problem isn’t fiat money. The problem is that all money is hierarchically controlled as an asset to private sector institutions and elite capital holders who have the ability to call-in their chips, i.e. your bank digits, whereas it’s an interest-bearing debt to governments and the people.
Originally posted by Jazzyguy
I'm really sorry that the government currently is holding you back. Are you sure you got no place to go? What about native american reservation?
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
Originally posted by Jazzyguy
I'm really sorry that the government currently is holding you back. Are you sure you got no place to go? What about native american reservation?
I've actually never thought of that. If they truly are an anarchy it could be worth a look.
Although I'm not sure how the Indians would feel about me and a bunch of white libertarian friends coming to crash the party.
Of course, there's the rub. Not only is all good land in the world under the control of government, but it's also inhabited. So it may not be government holding me back after all, but reality.
That's why I was envisioning more of a "community secession" approach to the experiment. Get a community of like-minded people to declare its independence. Of course, the state would have to go along with it or we'd just all get massacred (law of the jungle and rule of the strong, indeed).
Regarding monetary system, this is the main entity through the banking system that keep us enslaved to a large degree, constantly trying to get hold of an illusion they have created that most people buy into: That we need money to survive, and that money is worth something - while the truth is that money is nothing more than a great scam on humankind, some pieces of paper with some illustrations on them, and for the major parts only numbers in computer system for amounts that do not even exist physicall. Nor is this money backed up with anything of real value, such as in older times when you could exchange your money bills into its worths of gold in the bank, thus having something solid backing it up. Now, money is just made from thin air and given a value by those powers that be in control, and they decide how much they want to create and how they want to influence the world with that money etc.
As a sidenote, it was the very negative forces working for the ones controlling the Trap System that created the banking institutions as we know them around 1000 years ago through the secret occult order of the Knights Templars, they did a good job (for their own agenda) and turned people into more slavery than ever before.
People came long before money, and lived fine without it for hundreds of thousands of years and it has only existed a fraction of the time humans have lived on Earth yet probably been the cause of greater problems than much else in that large timespan before money was used.
She goes on to quote Franklin:
Paper currency secured against future tax revenues, he said, turned prosperity tomorrow into ready money today.
The riches of a country are to be valued by the quantity of labor its inhabitants are able to purchase and not by the quantity of gold and silver they possess.