It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by misinformational
Indeed this is true. Unfortunately there is not much to do about it, as the legal system is inherently flawed by a lot of the precedent system.
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
And a few of us Missourians didn't take to kindly to this asshat and his followers disrespecting the grieving families.
Originally posted by Varemia
Personally I would give up nothing. I am a lot more tolerant and able to ignore than a lot of people. It is for those who are extremely sensitive that our rights will become limited.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
People are protected from hate speech. Freedom of speech does not mean you can say anything.
It is called the harm principle. If a person's statement can cause harm, it is not covered under freedom of speech.
I personally believe in freedom from speech.
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
reply to post by muzzleflash
Phelps and his followers put themselves in a position to receive violence.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
And a few of us Missourians didn't take to kindly to this asshat and his followers disrespecting the grieving families.
I don't take kindly to people disrespecting the Freedoms our soldiers bled for.
That is a fast way to make his/her funeral a joke by trying to ruin everything they fought for.
Originally posted by misinformational
reply to post by Mercenary2007
I have a sneaking suspicion that when Phelps' does get on the receiving end of his hate, he won't get much sympathy from LEO. If I was an officer, I'd lose reports, manipulate evidence, etc. even if the dude was killed - Especially considering most LEO are Veterans
[edit on 16-8-2010 by misinformational]
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by nixie_nox
People are protected from hate speech. Freedom of speech does not mean you can say anything.
It is called the harm principle. If a person's statement can cause harm, it is not covered under freedom of speech.
I personally believe in freedom from speech.
Your speech harms me.
So you agree you should be banned correct?
Sorry but I think you only support speech that you agree with, obviously.
And people are only protected from speech that incites violence. Not hate speech your wrong on that 100%.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by misinformational
But they are violating the harm principle.
It is the same principle that keeps protestors from walking around with pictures of penises in front of schools.
Originally posted by Varemia
I think a private funeral should not be allowed to be impinged by a public protest. As a private function it should be allowed to call upon law enforcement to keep public intrusion at bay.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
What a weak arguement. Is that the best you can do?
And read up on it before making what is obviously an emotional and baseless statement.
It is called a search engine. Try it sometime.
infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble