It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by AquariusDescending
The FBI was involved with the 1993 bombing, and that's court-documented fact. Just look up the FBI's informant to the alleged terrorist cell, "Emad Salem."
He provided testimony about the FBI trying to set up that "cell" with a fake bomb for a sting operation, and gave them the idea to explode it in the basement of the WTC Towers, but then then somehow or another they got their hands on a real one instead....
I did, and what do I find but yet more lies being circulated by the conspiracy mongers to get people all paranoid over shadows. The FBI was intending to give them a fake bomb in order to catch them in the act, but a dimwit FBI official pulled the plug on the operation becuase he didn't take Emad Salem's report of a bombing attempt seriously. This "FBI involvement" as the poster manipulated it into is really a sting operation that the FBI incompetence fudged up.
So the question is, if there's so much "blatant evidence" of a conspiracy then why to the conspiracy mongers need to resort to manufacturing their own like this?
Originally posted by jprophet420
Why would you call him a dimwitt if he wasn't involved?
And by the way, he recorded the phone calls. Its a fact they were involved. You can argue the level of their involvement all you want but to deny it is to take ignorance to a new level.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by AquariusDescending
The FBI was involved with the 1993 bombing, and that's court-documented fact. Just look up the FBI's informant to the alleged terrorist cell, "Emad Salem."
He provided testimony about the FBI trying to set up that "cell" with a fake bomb for a sting operation, and gave them the idea to explode it in the basement of the WTC Towers, but then then somehow or another they got their hands on a real one instead....
I did, and what do I find but yet more lies being circulated by the conspiracy mongers to get people all paranoid over shadows. The FBI was intending to give them a fake bomb in order to catch them in the act, but a dimwit FBI official pulled the plug on the operation becuase he didn't take Emad Salem's report of a bombing attempt seriously. This "FBI involvement" as the poster manipulated it into is really a sting operation that the FBI incompetence fudged up.
So the question is, if there's so much "blatant evidence" of a conspiracy then why to the conspiracy mongers need to resort to manufacturing their own like this?
Originally posted by jprophet420
Then what did who make up? You said "like this" but then went on to agree they were involved. Confirmed its not made up by all 3 of us. So what is it?
Originally posted by whatukno
Now everyone manners and decorum.
The reason I brought up the 1993 bombing was because it may be partial to the cause of the buildings collapsing as they did. I wasn't assigning blame to anyone over the bombing, but the fact that a bombing took place.
I still assert however that two planes hitting the sides of the buildings wouldn't be sufficient to bring about a total global failure like what happened on that day. Logically the damaged areas would have fallen off from the top, especially seeing as the twin towers were in fact three separate buildings stacked on top one another.
But just because it's illogical to assume that the plane damage was the cause of the total global failure, does not automatically mean that it was some nefarious government plot.