It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Devino
reply to post by tauristercus
How can you be sure that this isn't a one time deal and is rather cyclical?
How accurate do you think your estimate of a 16,000 year cycle is?
I also notice the disconnect between the curves in your long timescale graph and wondered if this isn't half of a continuous wave.
Originally posted by mbkennel
Yes, it is true.
en.wikipedia.org...
The Earth's axis completes one full cycle of precession approximately every 26,000 years. At the same time, the elliptical orbit rotates, more slowly, leading to a 21,000-year cycle between the seasons and the orbit. In addition, the angle between Earth's rotational axis and the normal to the plane of its orbit moves from 22.1 degrees to 24.5 degrees and back again on a 41,000-year cycle; currently, this angle is 23.44 degrees and is decreasing.
[edit on 28-7-2010 by mbkennel]
Originally posted by Devino
reply to post by mothershipzeta
Notice that there is a much more radical tilt of the Earth's axis over less amount of time than the Wiki information. I think this suggest a trigger event rather than a normal oscillating cycle.
Originally posted by Essan
reply to post by epsilon69
A good point
What evidence is there that the Egyptians who erected the Karnak gnomon were aware of any axial tilt?
Maybe that's why it was wrong?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Essan
Maybe someone better versed in Egyptology can help me out but now that you mention it, Dodwell seems to have been relying upon some questionable information. He mentions "King Amen Emhat" (Amenemhat) as laying the foundation for the temple of Amon Re in 2045B.C. The trouble with that is that Amenemhat was not alive in 2045 B.C. and any work he did at Karnak did not survive (other than some statues).
The temple which Dodwell uses was constructed in around 1500 B.C. That kind of messes up the curve doesn't it?
www.setterfield.org...
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by epsilon69
The dates of the pharaohs are pretty well established (within a couple of decades). The Egyptians could write after all and the kings were proud of their work.