It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Iran expects the United States to launch a military strike on "at least two countries" in the Middle East in the next three months, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told state-run Press TV.
In an interview recorded on Monday, Ahmadinejad did not specify whether he thought Iran itself would be attacked nor did he say what intelligence led him to expect such a move.
The United States and Israel have refused to rule out military action against Iran's nuclear program which they fear could lead to it making a bomb, something Iran denies.
Ahmadinejad said Iran had "very precise information that the Americans have hatched a plot, according to which they to wage a psychological war against Iran."
Originally posted by Portugoal
www.abovetopsecret.com...
That should clarify what I meant a little better.
If you think about it, what 2 countries in the ME would America consider attacking next? Pakistan? I don't think so. I think Iran has to be one of them. Occupying two more countries essentially forces Iran into war, whether or not Iran is actually one of those "at least 2 countries."
[edit on 27-7-2010 by Portugoal]
Originally posted by Catch_a_Fire
Another 2 countries to be attacked?, Could America honestly cope with all this?....i think not. Although its believable, America couldnt sustain conflict with another 2 countries, and then if you throw in the Korean saga they/we would be biting off more than can be chewed.
Ahmadinejad said Iran had "very precise information that the Americans have hatched a plot, according to which they to wage a psychological war against Iran."
Originally posted by Catch_a_Fire
reply to post by princeofpeace
To 'occupy' you would have to first 'attack', and once the occupation is underway, how long could it be sustained for. Having a few ME countries with grievences against us is one thing, but IMO to try and take over another 2 would be suicidal, not only in loss of life and cost but i think politically it would ruffle a few feathers. The people that are on our side may not be for much longer.
Originally posted by Catch_a_Fire
Another 2 countries to be attacked?, Could America honestly cope with all this?....i think not. Although its believable, America couldnt sustain conflict with another 2 countries, and then if you throw in the Korean saga they/we would be biting off more than can be chewed.
Originally posted by jonny2410
I'm 90% confident Israel and Hezbollah will be waging full scale war by the year's end. All the signs point to it.
Therefore i could see US involvement in that.
The discovery of large natural gas reserves under the waters of the eastern Mediterranean could potentially mean a huge economic windfall for Israel and Lebanon, both resource-poor nations — if it doesn't spark new war between them.
The Hezbollah militant group has blared warnings that Israel plans to steal natural gas from Lebanese territory and vows to defend the resources with its arsenal of rockets. Israel says the fields it is developing do not extend into Lebanese waters, a claim experts say appears to be correct, but the maritime boundary between the two countries — still officially at war — has never been precisely set.
"Lebanon's need for the resistance has doubled today in light of Israeli threats to steal Lebanon's oil wealth," Hezbollah's Executive Council chief Hashem Safieddine said last month. The need to protect the offshore wealth "pushes us in the future to strengthen the resistance's capabilities."