It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach 9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then who knows how fast it can go!..."
I was extremely skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claimed size for the TR-3B, of 600 feet across. At first, I thought that this must be a typo. Why would anyone in their right mind build a "Tactical Reconnaissance" vehicle 2 football fields long? They must be nuts!
Originally posted by Gazrok
If I were a general, and a contractor came to me with a 600' tactical recon vehicle, I'd...
1. tell him he was crazy
2. tell him to make it a carrier for personnel and equipment
I can't imagine that such a ship (if it exists, which I doubt, at that size) would be for recon use....
3 multimode thrusters mounted at each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach 9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then who knows how fast it can go
The unicorn has a single horn that dirupts space time and lets it travel at speeds faster than light. Its two horse shoes are made out of element 324 which allows it to diguise its self as a regular tree.
Originally posted by Gazrok
If I were a general, and a contractor came to me with a 600' tactical recon vehicle, I'd...
1. tell him he was crazy
2. tell him to make it a carrier for personnel and equipment
I can't imagine that such a ship (if it exists, which I doubt, at that size) would be for recon use....
Originally posted by SpeDeZo
reply to post by Bedlam
Anyway if anyone here on ATS has had some sort of Physics and chemistry background you can do some calculations and post them here to prove that this is hoax. If you can't find conclusive evidence then the case is just open. Simple. I don't care neither way, but I'm interested in results.
Oh why these people have to use Ångström instead of nanometers or pikometers?
[edit on 15-5-2010 by SpeDeZo]