It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Our mandate was sweeping. The law directed us to investigate “facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001,” including those relating to intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies, diplomacy immigration issues and border control, the flow of assets to terrorist organizations, commercial aviation, the role of congressional oversight and resource allocation, and other areas determined relevant by the Commission.”
Originally posted by theability
This is were my mind has been regarding the issues with 9/11 and the way our country handled the tragedy.
Not one word: WTC 7 and the 9/11 Commission Report
Now tell me what I am suppose to believe about 9/11!
If they cannot report what actually happened, then the report is not based upon anything other than a plan!
my 0.02
Originally posted by theability
This is a serious issue, not only does the Report omit this, but in Preface says the law that they must include this issue in the report and they don't! Thus making this report, biased and unworthy of being FACTUAL.
They broke they law, it even says that on the first page!
Now tell me what I am suppose to believe about 9/11!
If they cannot report what actually happened, then the report is not based upon anything other than a plan!
my 0.02
It seems your stance is quite a stretch.
WTC 7 wasn't as high a priority to the 9/11 commission as it is to you becuase it had been fully evacuated by the time it collapsed so none was killed.
Originally posted by theability
How is this stretch?? My stance is what they claim, this is not a thread about explosives, not a thread about no planes, not a thread about various myths.
Originally posted by theability
In that case, Facts are WTC 7 fell, and there is not a word mentioned about it.
Now why?
It has nothing to do with FATALITIES, at all.
It has in my opinion to do with ommiting those things that cannot be answered, in direct correlation to the agenda. Because if they do, it will require a REAL investigation.
Which the 9/11 Commission was anything but.
The report not mentioning one item doesn't mean the items it does mention are false.
Originally posted by theability
This is intresteting that you believe that a 47 story building succumbing, no matter what way, isn't a HIGH priority!
All engineers throughout the world do believe this to be a HIGH priority! Because if buildings just start to fall,
ohh no biggy, that isn't a high priority! what?
Originally posted by theability
reply to post by GoodOlDave
FACT the Verison building did NOT FALL to the ground!
THAT IS KNOWN...ok
We are talking about HUGE engineering issues here, not a building with debris, or even dead people for that matter.
FACT is WTC 7 no matter what way you look at it, should have been reported in the 9/11 Commission.
All right, if you're going to go that route, then may I ask why do you conspiracy people care more about empty buildings than you do human life?
Originally posted by theability
If facts are to be included in the 9/11 report, then WTC 7 must be mentioned.
There is no requirement for WTC7 to be mentioned.
That's why it's not there.
Originally posted by theability
If you read the Preface, it simply states that by LAW, Facts must be investigated.
The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9-11 Commission), an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002, is chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks. The Commission is also mandated to provide recommendations designed to guard against future attacks.
www.9-11commission.gov...