It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
That's one example. Funny, but I saw no mention of the location of passenger remains, one of the questions that you asked.
I asked you to produce the NTSB accident report for PSA 1771.
It is your belief that they all contain this info.
Originally posted by ATH911
Where did I say the NTSB releases detailed accident reports on every plane crash?
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
So then they don't, correct?
You just admitted they don't especially in a case like PSA 1771, since it was a crime scene and under the jurisdiction of the FBI.
Sounds kinda like Fl93, don't it?
Originally posted by ATH911
Because in order to debunk the official story, we must know what the official story is.
When I show evidence that I say contradicts the official story, I keep hearing in return from skeptics that isn't the official story. So to prevent any moving of the goal posts, I've simply asked skeptics to tell us what they think the official story is.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
But sceptics didn't put together the "Official Story". It's an aggregation of reports and data from lots of different sources.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
What if two "sceptics" have different interpretations of the data? Are there then two "Official Stories"?
Originally posted by hooper
No, the problem is that you like to take a lot of disparate quotes, some obviously presented metaphorically, and try to create "facts" about the dynamics of the crash of Flight 93.
Like the preposterous notion that since the plane was "buried" then so must be most of the passengers.
An FBI spokesman once said that they recovered about 95% of the physical remains of the plane
The exact distribution of material by volume and weight between dispersed and embedded materials is irrelevant and not the subject of in-depth forensic analysis.
Most interviews that you have posted, from press sources, seem to indicate that a substantial amount of the remains was subjected to embeddedment. But you offer nothing more than a repitition of your own specualtions. Nothing more.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911
www.ntsb.gov...
Originally posted by hooper
ATH911 wants some kind of forensic analysis of the crash site hoping to find some irrelevant minutae that he can exploit as a supposed "smoking gun" based on his in-depth knowledge of the physics of plane impact dynamics.
As far as I know and I care, they never did any such thing becuase it was irrelevant.
As their should be a forensic analysis of the crash site. I mean we are talking about a crime scene.
Originally posted by hooper
Yes. It details where and when the plane crashed, attitude and speed.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by hooper
Yes. It details where and when the plane crashed, attitude and speed.
That's your most comprehensive Shanksville crash report?!
You need help.
Originally posted by ATH911
There can only be one goal post planted in one spot.