It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TiredofControlFreaks
Northwarden
The original study had nothing whatsoever to do with smoking. The press release made it all about smoking. That is a lie!
Do you have an opinion on public health lying to the public "for their own good"
How do you feel knowing that HPV has been implicated with lung cancer for 30 years and that it might be a curable disease if the proper anti-viral agents are developed? To know that countless billions of dollars have been spent on anti-smoking propaganda instead of proper scientific research?
Did Westcoast's grandfather die of lung cancer or did he die because public health is not interested in curing lung cancer? If there was a cure or a vaccine for lung cancer - what would they scare the public with next?
Tired of Control Freaks
Originally posted by Magnum007
As a smoker I must say that I know the risks and that I decide to take them... Everyone is afflicted with the same disease, it's called LIFE... No cure, no treatment, nobody gets out of it alive...
So whether it's by cancer at 50 or from dementia at 90, I will die someday... I live everyday knowing this, as if I will die the next, even though after my death I can't say "well I did this and didn't do that"...
Magnum
Originally posted by TiredofControlFreaks
whoshotjr:
And what do the never smokers do when they get lung cancer? Is it less painful for them? What do they regret? Do their families get angry at them?
I know you are angry at your dad for getting sick! You can blame smoking if you want to but this disease will never be conquered on the basis of lies from public health.
Everyone dies - even never smoking vegetarians with an exercise fetish and living to 100 isn't all its cracked up to be.
Instead of being angry with your dad, perhaps you should spend the time you have left on more pleasant conversations. No matter what you think - you know only two facts. Your dad smoked and your dad is dying of cancer. And you don't know if those two facts are related or not.
As a matter of fact - since lung cancer generally occurs to people in their sixties and seventies - this case is less likely to be related to smoking then you might think. Watch yourself - Being the son of someone who died of lung cancer puts you at high risk of the disease because of genetics.
You of all people should be hoping that it is a viral caused cancer and that some anti-viral agent could provide the cure.
Tired of Control Freaks