It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Wow, suggestive thinking has gone crazy on ATS lately!!!
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
I was in the N.Z. Navy in the 80s and trust me, everything is still in the same place.
But you are right to some degree, if I am not mistaken N.Z. is moving North by 4 inches a year. So if you come back on in the year 2000010, we will have shifted enough to make a new thread.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by LastStandingMan
There are people like me that have always remembered and still think vividly that NZ is located on the left side/to the northwest of Australia. Then there is Australia, which should be in the middle of nowhere, just a lot of blue water all around it and far away from other land masses (except for NZ on its left side).
Errrrrr
New Zealand has always been where it is....I have seen a map from the 50's which shows that new Zealand is in its current position. Also last time I went to New Zealand I flew east, not north west, and Im sure being from the west coast, I wouldve realised if New Zealdn had moved
By the way, this thread is hilarious
Originally posted by OmegaLogos
Explanation: Very interesting! S&F!
I live in Australia [OL is an Aussie by birth] and NZ has ALWAYS been to the SE of the EASTERN coast of Australia [and still is!] FOR ME!
But if the Timeline has changed or even MERGED with another timeline then yes what you say could be true from the POV of someone who was from another timeline where NZ was to the NW of Australia.
Most Kiwi's that I know of 1st moved from NZ to Bondi beach, which is in Sydney in NSW and on the EAST coast of Australia because it was super close to NZ. I've heard jokes about them being able to see it on the horizon when the sun rises! :shk:
I compared Google Earth with my 1983 Britannica Atlas book and it was PERFECTLY the same as I have always known it.
This is not to say that the timeline hasn't changed and that NZ and or Australia havent moved dramatically. I'm just giving my very limited POV on this issue OK.
Personal Disclosure: I'd love to see some Atlas pictures of NZ to the NW of Australia as that would freaking blow my mind hardcore.
Originally posted by Ha`la`tha
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by LastStandingMan
There are people like me that have always remembered and still think vividly that NZ is located on the left side/to the northwest of Australia. Then there is Australia, which should be in the middle of nowhere, just a lot of blue water all around it and far away from other land masses (except for NZ on its left side).
Errrrrr
New Zealand has always been where it is....I have seen a map from the 50's which shows that new Zealand is in its current position. Also last time I went to New Zealand I flew east, not north west, and Im sure being from the west coast, I wouldve realised if New Zealdn had moved
By the way, this thread is hilarious
Lmao, isnt it.. I was all about to go on a joke-rant about how Australia must have got drunk and woke up somewhere else again, etc.. but the thread itself is far more funny
Ahhh.. hear that you kiwis, get back up north!!!! and stay there!!
Originally posted by Chance321
reply to post by OzWeatherman
Oh, come'on I clearly knows where Canada is down there. Matter of factly I remembered that they were still trucking snow south for the olympics. Then you gots all those peoples coming downs from Mexico.
(Sorry couldn't resist)
Originally posted by just theory
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Actually there is
1. If New Zealanders were north west of WA, they would have darker skin
2. If it was there, then it wouldnt have fit perfectly into the east coast of Australia, as it did when Pangae broke up millions of years ago
3. The timeline would have had to have changed thousands of years ago for every single world map to be incorrect
4. The kiwi bird would not exist
None of that is something a time shifter could argue for or against, you're still dealing with their memories which is just as bad as their beliefs like proving god does or doesn't exist, i don't get what you mean with your 3rd point, a person shifting between time lines is different to what you're talking about.