It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by superrat
As for pre-existing conditions, the point of insurance companies like all companies is to make a profit for their shareholders. The disqualifrying of high risk people is a prudent business practice just like not giving car insurance to people with dangerous driving records is a prudent decision.
Originally posted by superrat
As far as health costs, the reason that this is spinning out of control is the high amount of regulation that the governments try to place on medical industries. De-regulation leads to innovation and greater cost effectiveness which in tern leads to the ability to cover more people with health care at lower costs.
Originally posted by superrat
We are not a socialist country. We operate on the free market system.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
if we were a true pure capitalist nation with no socialism whatsoever, we would not have these damned socialist programs:
social security
medicade
military
police/firemen
roads/highways
etc...basically, there would be nothing publically owned as publically owned stuff = governmental owned paid for by taxes (a social program also where you give up money so everyone can have these things)
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
...and howze that working for you?
Globalism eliminated the free market system. Notice the foreclosures? The unemployment? The world changed. One might want to take notice.
As to health care...taking care of your own is not a Commie plot.
Originally posted by superrat
Health is no different. It is a business just like everything else. it is sold in the marketplace and it responds to the laws of supply and demand and cause and effect.
Originally posted by MrPresident
Except health, is a human life, not a car or house.
Your arguments are all built upon just economic and hierarchy ideas which do not include any morals what so ever.
If the world was built, with ideas such as yours, you would be my slave and I would be somebody's dog.
Originally posted by superrat
The efficiency of the market place means that US medical care is the best in the world, which is why that Canadian Premier bailed on the Canadian system and headed here when he needed real health care.
Originally posted by mdl59
reply to post by MrPresident
Yes it is moral. However, why should I work as hard as I do to provide health insurance for my family if someone else who is capable of working as hard as I do but chooses not to, is going to receive the same level of care on my dime? That does not make any sense whatsoever. Healthcare is not a "right"