It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Police charged Jordan Miles, 18, with assault and resisting arrest Jan. 11 because, they said, he fought with the officers who thought a "heavy object" in his coat was a gun. It turned out to be a bottle of Mountain Dew.
Miles said he resisted because he thought the men were trying to abduct him and didn't identify themselves as police.
Miles' family and attorney said he was hit with a stun gun and hospitalized after the violent Homewood struggle during which a chunk of his hair was yanked out and a tree branch went through his gums.
"I was accused for something I never had anyth
Originally posted by ugie1028
seems simple, but i don't these cops got it right.
Did they check his pocket before, or after they kicked the crap out of this kid?
he was 18, an honors student, and a violinist.
I don't know what really happened, besides what the news article covers, but from what it looks like these cops were in the wrong. as you said, they could of just dug through his pocket, end of story. the kid also said they didn't identify themselves, and he defended himself. the beating he got, wasn't deserved.
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by rcwj1975
I don't know what really happened...
Originally posted by WTFover
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by rcwj1975
I don't know what really happened...
So how are you arriving at the conclusion that the cops are wrong? Why not stay neutral, until you do "know what really happened"? Innocent until proven guilty applies, equally, to the cops and the kid. Does it not?
Originally posted by WTFover
So how are you arriving at the conclusion that the cops are wrong? Why not stay neutral, until you do "know what really happened"? Innocent until proven guilty applies, equally, to the cops and the kid. Does it not?
Originally posted by TrueBrit
Of course you are right to concentrate on the facts of this case, and there will no doubt be elements to this that we have not heard. If Im not mistaken the story goes that the kid was hit with a stun gun (assuming tazer?) . If this is true, normaly a beating would be completely over the top. What is your opinion on that, and have you ever had cause to follow a stun with something more brutal ?