posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 07:34 PM
reply to post by adifferentbreed
Actually in regards to her requests, how far can one go to the aspect of a "jury of one's peers"?
I always thought that would be a good beginning to a trial, especially if the trial would be in regards to a unconstitutional law case.
If a defendant is being prosecuted for say a statute, that is closely or is blatantly against the constitution, could one not argue, that the jury be
knowledgeable enough to make said judgment.
As for this case though, I believe to try and make a jury of one's peer by bases of religion or race, to be a folly.
This is possibly a very good debatable subject there ADB!
[edit on 1/15/2010 by endisnighe]