It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
According to an expert on the Middle East, Israel may soon no longer be alone in possessing nuclear weapons in that volatile region of the globe.
But the other power with "the bomb" may not necessarily be Iran. While some countries claim Tehran is bent on becoming a nuclear-armed power – a claim Iran denies – an Arab country already is taking steps to go nuclear, says Jim Hoagland, the Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post journalist, who spoke Thursday at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
"As a senior Arab political official who was in town recently said to a small group of us, [that] it's clear there is already activity underway on the Arab side on the development of nuclear weapons," Hoagland told a packed room at the institute's offices. Hoagland did not identify the Arab official or others in the "small group," and hastened to add that there were "no details to provide."
Israel is the only known Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons -- with anywhere from 100 to 400 warheads in its stockpile. The Jewish nation -- which has never signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty -- never confirms or denies its nuclear status. And the U.S., to avoid an embarrassing clash with its closest ally in the region, never confirms or denies Israel's nuclear arsenal as well.
In 2007 Israel bombed a Syrian site that it claimed was being used for nuclear weapons development. Syria has denied the accusation and an official with a Vienna-based agency that follows nuclear weapons issues says there has never been evidence shown to support the Israeli claim.
"I think there's some interesting continuity on this point," Hoagland said. "During the Bush administration there was discussion about a nuclear umbrella, a doctrine that would be directed at reassuring Arab states in the Gulf, Arab states at large, that they would be protected against an Iranian nuclear weapon."
Originally posted by Signals
That is a bit of a tease....My money would be on Saudi Arabia. Interesting how the article mentions cooperation between Saudis & Pakistan....couldn't they just buy them from the U.S.
If it was Syria it's hard to believe Israel wouldn't know about it and bomb them again....
Your M.A.D. idea for the region is an interesting take as well....big danger for crazy factions taking control of them (I know you'll say ~Israel~ in response to that) but just saying...
Do you think Israel would ever push the big red button on someone?
Originally posted by Signals
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I agree but nobody will ever offer to turn them in first.
"Is just this another way to subjugate Arab nations and their oil supplies?"
YES, without a doubt!
[edit on 11-1-2010 by Signals]
Originally posted by seattletruth
Excuse my ignorance...
But does Pakistan not count as a Middle Eastern nuclear power?? They are touching Iran.
They have a stockpile of nuclear weapons, and have since the early 90s.
Originally posted by Signals
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
As ridiculous as it sounds I wouldn't be surprised if he IS referring to Yemen....seeing as how that is where the propaganda is being focused as of late. OMG WMD's, "They're coming right for us"