Harlem Pastor says Obama's Presidency was Paid by Saudi's

Well, surely Obama didn't know about this..........I mean between him and Queen Nancy (Pelosi), we have the most transparent ethical administration ever. They'd have told us if it was true.

Well there can't be an alternate energy presidency cause the
Nazis (well Illuminati lets say) still have that locked up.
So what do you think.
We are better off with oil and Saudi's and fight the ones that
do not like the arrangement.
So living under ex Nazis seems dumb and not an option.
See, we did not win the war of open science.
Science of energy is a closed book.
This idea best be ignored and passed over
or bring on hordes of free energy deniers.

So before WWI and WWII people were probably talking about the same things that we consider here and now. What advice does the past offer? We see all the signs clearly. We see history repeating itself.

This is the final stake to be driven through the heart of America.

It goes deeper than I have words to express.

As someone said earlier,there is no going back.

If people thought we were "divided" before,that's nothing compared with what's to come.

I don't think we have a choice but to seek oil reserves and
fight any rag tag group of terrorists that wish us ill.
If we had the so called free energy we would not need the oil
but still fight the terrorists that are against modern progress.
Egypt finally got electrical power from Russian built dams,
China will have great electrical power from dams for copper
and steel production.
We might have to fight off, physical force or otherwise, those
that seek the free energy secrets.
However this is going on right now and not a world wide problem
at the moment.
Consider Tesla is for real and might power the continent of Africa
with a series of towers, no need for water.
And the possibility to make water happen on any desert.
We can't know if this is true but some things indicate there is
great truth in supposing the science is held a bay.

Like many senators, congressmen, academics, media heads - the Oval Office has now been paid for and secured for Saudi & Co interests. No secret to anyone aware in Washington and press circles.

News to most especially conspiracists who have been deflected into looking elsewhere. The anti-Jewish thing is a component to keep attention from where it is needed the most.

The Saudi royal family itself aren't that smart. They've been given expert advice by high level British and American PR and marketing firms.

This is largely a British thing. They knew they would get the breakaway colony back under their control one way or another. It took longer than expected.


M

[edit on 10-1-2010 by mmiichael]

Here is a great article regarding Obama's blurry years at Harvard. Pay close attention to the the college loan claims and what was actually filed in his financial disclosure statement prior to running as a candidate. Follow the link for more detail. Harlem connections are mentioned throughout. The good pastor would certainly be in the know.

How exactly did Barack Obama pay for his Harvard Law School education?

The way the Obama campaign has answered the question was simply hard work and student loans.

But new questions have been raised about Obama’s student loans and Obama’s ties to a radical Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies during the years 1988 to 1991.

The allegations first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.

In the interview, Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Khalid Al-Mansour, a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the party was founded in the early 1960s.

Sutton described al-Mansour as advisor to “one of the world’s richest men,” Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal.

Prince Alwaleed catapulted to fame in the United States after the September 11 attacks, when New York mayor Rudy Guiliani refused his $10 million check to help rebuild Manhattan, because the Saudi prince hinted publicly that America’s pro-Israel policies were to blame for the attacks.

he Obama campaign told Newsmax that Obama self-financed his three years at Harvard Law School with loans, and did not receive any scholarship from Harvard Law school.

LaBolt denied that Obama received any financial assistance from Harvard or from outside parties. “No - he paid his way through by taking out loans,” he said in an email to Newsmax.

At the time, Harvard cost around $25,000 a year, or $75,000 for the three years that Obama attended. And as president of the Harvard Law Review, he received no stipend from the school, Harvard spokesman Mike Armini said.

“That is considered a volunteer position,” Armini said. “There is no salary or grant associated with it.”

So if the figures cited by the Obama campaign for the Senator’s student loans are accurate, that means that Obama came up with more than $32,000 over three years from sources other than loans to pay for tuition, room and board.

Where did he find the money? Did it come from friends of Khalid Al Mansour? And why would a radical Muslim activist with ties to the Saudi royal family be raising money for Barack Obama?

That’s the question the Obama campaign still won’t answer.

Speaking at a campaign event in Haverford, Pa, in April of this year, Michelle Obama claimed that her husband had “just paid off his loan debt” for his Harvard Law School education.

In an appearance in Zanesville, Ohio, in February she bemoaned the fact that many American families were strapped with student loan payments for years after graduation.

“The only reason we’re not in that position is that Barack wrote two best-selling books,” she said. The first of those best-sellers netted the couple $1.2 million in royalties in 2005.

In response to Newsmax questions about the Obama’s college loans, a campaign spokesman cited a report in The Chicago Sun claiming that Obama borrowed $42,753 to pay for Harvard Law School, and “tens of thousands” more to pay for undergraduate studies at Columbia.

The same report said that Michelle Obama borrowed $40,762 to pay for her years at Harvard Law School.

But a Newsmax review of Senator Obama’s financial disclosures found no trace of any outstanding college loans, going back to 2000.

As a United States Senate candidate, Barack Obama was required to file a financial disclosure form in 2004 detailing his assets, income, consulting contracts, and liabilities.

Obama listed “zero” under liabilities in 2004 and in all subsequent U.S. Senate financial disclosure forms.

Under the Senate ethics rules, he is required to disclose any loan, including credit card debt, of $10,000 or more. The only exception to the reporting requirement is mortgage debt on a principal residence.

The Senate reports also directly contradict Michelle Obama’s claim that the couple had “only just” paid off their student loans after receiving book royalties paid out in 2005 and 2006 – well after her husband had been ensconced in the Senate.

Responding to attacks from the Hillary Clinton campaign during the primaries, Obama released seven years of tax returns on March 25 of this year.

The returns, dating back to 2000, indicate that the couple paid no interest on their student loans. The interest from such loans would have been deductible on their joint income tax returns.

For 2000 through 2004, taxpayers declared student loan interest as a deduction on line 24 of federal form 1040. After 2004, the deduction can be taken on Line 33.

But the Obamas never declared a dime of interest in student loans on their return, most likely because they simply earned too much money to be able to take the deduction under the IRS rules.

newsmax.com...

[edit on 10-1-2010 by jibeho]

The amount of information that was available pointing toward Obama's true loyalties even before the election was staggering! And so effectively kept from the general public,it was plain they(the MSM) were all bought and paid for.

When the mask comes off,those same people who supported him,hoping for real Change,will be absolutely shocked.

I wonder what the reaction of those who were glad to hear Obama say,"We are no longer a Christian nation" will be when they find themselves living in a Muslim nation. From what I understand,they don't take kindly to homosexuality,militant feminism,drinking alcohol,and the like.

While Christians might be apt to say that God doesn't condone something,they aren't the ones carrying out that judgement. They are more likely to pray for you then cut your head off.

This "Christian" nation was the best there ever was,but that's not kids have been taught in school.

As usual,sometimes people don't realize what they had until it's gone!

From www.discoverthenetworks.org...

QUOTE:

... In thousands of public school districts across the United States, without ever knowing it, taxpayers pay to disseminate pro-Islamic materials that are anti-American, anti-Israel and anti-Jewish.

...Often bypassing school boards and nudging aside approved curricula, teaching programs funded by Saudi Arabia make their way into elementary and secondary school classrooms."...

This is coming fast and furious. I mean, we surely don't have the luxury of a generation to educate and instill the level of pride needed to hold onto our beloved country.

We've already got a generation of entitled, lazy, 'politically-correct', foreign sympathizers to deal with. Heck, the Jihad will turn out to be easier to handle than our own young adults, as they will be the majority ones who end up bringing this nation to it's knees.

It's sad, really. I mean, we were all 20-something and most all of us had the same compassion and hatred towards our own governments. Maybe this was what started the 'study abroad' kick? Perhaps traveling abroad is what makes us cherish our own country.

Unfortunately, today is not the time for this generation to rebel. We are in serious and very dangerous water.

I guess the saddest part of this will be when it's over. This will be one of those moments when "I told you so" will be extremely painful to utter. However, I'm afraid that my emotions will pale in comparison to those of the 'naysayers'.

Let us remember that we once had their passion, their 'World Savior' ideology, and their gullibility. We've got to keep this in mind, especially when it will be furthest from our minds. It's too late to educate a new generation and it's far too late to 'un'educate one.

So, now what? BTW, any speculation on the ending? Their ending, not the one we hope for. Seriously, are we looking at slavery or genocide? Both?

[edit on 11-1-2010 by SourGrapes]

Dante's Inferno I suppose. Nuclear fallout like Chernobylx100. Biologicals that make the floating fatman of Dune look normal. MadMax cities and Thunderdomes. Escape from New York walled cities.
Fun to speculate.

The world as we know coming to an end because a backwards culture few Westerners knew or cared about a found themselves swimming in the most valuable demand resource in history - oil.

For a few decades they were happy enough to play Beverly Hillbillies. Of late becoming hostile as with all the newfound wealth they're still poor. But their shred leaders pocketing practically all of it find themselves multi-billionaires. They want to play in the Major Leagues and buy all the new toys. The ultimate being an atomic bomb. Now you can enact your tribal wars and not just defeat your enemies in battle - you can fry them en masse just by pressing a button. Or hasten the coming of the 12th Imam.


M

Originally posted by mmiichael

The world as we know coming to an end because a backwards culture few Westerners knew or cared about a found themselves swimming in the most valuable demand resource in history - oil.

For a few decades they were happy enough to play Beverly Hillbillies. Of late becoming hostile as with all the newfound wealth they're still poor. But their shred leaders pocketing practically all of it find themselves multi-billionaires. They want to play in the Major Leagues and buy all the new toys. The ultimate being an atomic bomb. Now you can enact your tribal wars and not just defeat your enemies in battle - you can fry them en masse just by pressing a button. Or hasten the coming of the 12th Imam.

Yes, nuclear war, not just a dropped bomb in Japan, will happen soon. I agree. I don't think anyone is prepared for that. The US will retaliate... even if someone has to go over Obama's head to do it.

I look back at the old coverage of the First Gulf War. The news blasted it 24/7 for a few weeks. It was a major deal. Tom Brocaw was all serious. We are in the same situation in Iraq and now Afghanistan and it's no where on MSM. So yeah, our attention span has decreased in the last 20 years. A big nuclear awakening is going to disasterous.

Originally posted by JJay55
Dante's Inferno I suppose. Nuclear fallout like Chernobylx100. Biologicals that make the floating fatman of Dune look normal. MadMax cities and Thunderdomes. Escape from New York walled cities.
Fun to speculate.

Sky high buildings and invisible roadways in the air.
Take the ether elevator, like the UFO saucer that defies Newtonian effects,
to the ground to see if there is any room.
The Dubai tower might be the first as the age of ether replaces the
age of oil and carbon based fuel as only the rich oil nations can
afford the ether conversion.

I am not truly sure what Manning's goal is. If you have heard a lot of his sermons on Obama running and eventually being president. Scary enough his speeches carry a racist tone. Which is strange due to the "Racial thing" in the first place.

I would find it more advisable to simply watch his sermons and speeches to understand Manning more. I watched plenty of them and from my own opinion his stake in this does not truly represent the same intentions of the ones filing suit after suit. (Paul Berg, Alan Keyes)

In all reality this whole thing will go on until Obama's administration is over. The only thing that plays on my heart about any of this. Is how the very ones most of us are against (Government Secrecy and Cover Ups) succeed daily by dividing us all on something such as this. To me this would be the greatest conspiracy of all!

We do not seek to over throw the Constitution but we seek to over throw those that pervert it. -Abraham Lincoln

Just a little up-date. This is coming from more sources all the time.

Investigators declare, “Obama never attended Columbia University”

February 8th, 2010

American Grand Jury has archived extensive records over the past year which we used in our jury hearings. We now believe beyond a reasonable doubt that Obama is not a “natural born” citizen and it is even possible that he may be an illegal alien.

We also have records showing the Democratic National Convention fraudulently declared Obama constitutionally eligible while never vetting the “natural born” requirement with the electorate.

Now, new evidence has come to light whereby Dr. James Manning has declared that Obama never attended Columbia University [New York].

Dr. Manning has hired a team of investigators to comb over every bit of available evidence to validate his declaration.
Manning’s investigators conclusively state that:

1) Columbia University will not divulge whether the “alleged” diploma issued was in the name of Barry Soetoro or Barack Hussein Obama. No public record exists regarding the diploma.

2) Obama alleges he attended Columbia in 1982, 1983. But, the investigators have been UNABLE to turn up a single shred of written documentation for the years 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 that show where Obama appeared on a school roster, register, faculty memo, bulletin board, school awards, dean’s list; where Obama’s name appeared in a yearbook, club record, fraternity record, extra curricular activity member roster, student newspaper, student radio or tv activity; where Obama appeared in any records as a worker, employee, laborer in or about Columbia University; where Obama enrolled in any sports activity or program.

3) As a graduating senior in 1983 he does not appear in any Political Science (his major) or Granduating Class yearbook or invitation records.

4) There is absolutely no documentation of any kind to show Obama attended, lived, worked or played at Columbia University during the investigated 4 years.

5) Interviewed professors, college employees, students (who were at Columbia during the years in question) have failed to turn up a single person that can remember Obama. This is irrefutable evidence. Think about your own situation if Obama had attended your college? A “now-famous” person went to your school? Many would be able to say, “of course I remember.” At Columbia, not a single person has been able to say he or she remembers Obama.

Below is a audio file of Dr. Manning going over the investigated information. Have a listen as he declares, “Obama never attended Columbia University.”


americangrandjury.org...

Yes it's true, Obama never attended Columbia University.

He attended Columbia COLLEGE - a different institution.

Manning is a mental defective.

That American Grand Jury is a whack-job Birther site.

There are a lot of questions about Obama and his career advancements.

Neither of the above are smart enough to figure it out.

reply to post by mmiichael


Sure,all that time they were investigating the wrong school!

That's a laugh!

Nice try.

Picked that tidbit up from Yahoo Answers. Possible the site corrected from University to College since.

Further quick check tons of stuff:


www.usnews.com...


cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com...


Columbia Alumni web page

www.college.columbia.edu...


"A spokesman for the university, Brian Connolly, confirmed that Mr. Obama spent two years at Columbia College and graduated in 1983 with a major in political science. He did not receive honors, Mr. Connolly said, though specific information on his grades is sealed. A program from the 1983 graduation ceremony lists him as a
graduate."

www.nysun.com...…


Remembrances of his writing teacher

nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com...…


An essay written by Obama for a Columbia publication in 1983

www.politico.com...…


Columbia's wikiCU

www.wikicu.com...


his senior seminar professor and others, including the former president of MTV Networks

www.nytimes.com...…


his roommate

www.college.columbia.edu...…

Originally posted by On the Edge
reply to post by mmiichael

 

Sure,all that time they were investigating the wrong school!

That's a laugh!

Well, no one said Birthers were smart.... and from this it is very obvious that they are not!

I appreciate your efforts,but I still have to remain skeptical of those sources as well. With so many things that don't add up,I suspect there could be some forgeries or other things that suddenly show up.

Considering this quote from David Rockefeller,in 1991...

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years."

"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

So who else is being bought off? I wonder.

The truth will come out eventually. This story just won't go away on it's own.

Believe me,I am not any kind of racist when I say I just want what's best for this country,and that includes all Americans.