It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
By Gavin Dahl
Sarah PalinConservative columnist David Brooks just went public again with his criticisms of Sarah Palin. "She's a joke. I can't take her seriously," he told ABC's George Stephanopoulos.
The question other members of the press are asking is whether this time around he will he codify his statements in print at The New York Times.
A month before last year's presidential election Brooks admitted to a forum in Manhattan that Palin was "not even close" to qualified for higher office. However, he failed to reveal the opinion in multiple columns after the comment. At the time, he was called "frighteningly dishonest" by Editor & Publisher's Greg Mitchell, who suggested he should debate himself on PBS.
There was little debate, however, on This Week Sunday. The other conservative on the panel with Brooks, George Will, isn't buying into the Palin frenzy either.
Will said he thinks Republicans can do better. "Some conservatives think they have found in Sarah Palin a Republican William Jennings Bryan," he said. "Now, why would they want someone who lost the presidency three times?"
Originally posted by joey_hv
Sarah Palin is a Litmus test.
If you are a real, Ronald Reagan conservative you love/like her.
If you don't love/like her you are a self proclaimed conservative but are in fact a moderate to left leaning Rino.
If you hate/fear her...you are a Democrat/Liberal.
This is the most accurate assessment of the Sarah Palin Phenomena I've seen to date.
Originally posted by snusfanatic
that's it. i say its time for conservatives to do to obama what liberals do to palin.
Originally posted by snusfanatic
reply to post by whaaa
one difference. obama has a record of failure as president. palin is a simple celebrity at this point. she doesn't threaten me.