It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, a new BBC poll has found widespread dissatisfaction with free-market capitalism.
In the global poll for the BBC World Service, only 11% of those questioned across 27 countries said that it was working well.
Most thought regulation and reform of the capitalist system were necessary.
Suppose you go to Washington and try to get at your government. You will always find that while you are politely listened to, the men really consulted are the men who have the big stake--the big bankers, the big manufacturers and the big masters of commerce…. The masters of the government of the United States are the combined capitalists and manufacturers of the United States.
reply to post by Zerbst
It also contains strict guidelines that forbid things like monopolizing, collusion,
Suppose you go to Washington and try to get at your government. You will always find that while you are politely listened to, the men really consulted are the men who have the big stake--the big bankers, the big manufacturers and the big masters of commerce…. The masters of the government of the United States are the combined capitalists and manufacturers of the United States. - Woodrow Wilson
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."
Conspiracy theorists generally speculate that the New World Order is being implemented gradually, citing the formation of the U.S. Federal Reserve System in 1913; the International Monetary Fund in 1944; the United Nations in 1945; the World Bank in 1945; the World Health Organization in 1948; the European Union and the euro currency in 1993; the World Trade Organization in 1998; and the African Union in 2002 as major milestones.[6]
- Wikipedia
... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we [must] bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people."[14] - HG Wells
"It is the system of nationalist individualism that has to go" - H.G. Wells
Originally posted by The Transhumanist
reply to post by Zerbst
It also contains strict guidelines that forbid things like monopolizing, collusion,
No it doesn't. Monopolies and Oligopolies would still exist in a free market. In fact, they would thrive in one. There would also be no regulations against pollution, no minimum wage, no work safety and product safety standards, and no regulations against companies raping and exploiting the natural resources of the developing world.
The government provides many public services such as sewage and garbage, the FAA the CDC, highways, the police, the fire departments and the USPS just no name a few. There is no need to turn these services over to private corporations who would most likely increase the cost of these services to increase profit margins.
A true free market does nothing to alleviate the extremes of poverty and instead relies on charity organizations, homeless shelters and churches to supply food and shelter to the millions who need it. This is an unrealistic assumption that these organizations alone can feed, clothe and house the poor purely with donated money.
There would also be no national army. We would rely solely on a corporate military and privite security companies to keep us safe, and can we really trust a company that profits from war to make unbiased decisions about when to go to war? The military industrial complex and big oil already weighs too heavily on those decisions as it is.
There would be no FDA which means so standards for food and drugs and big pharma would not have subsidies so they would underproduce to create artifical scarcity to maximize profits.
There would also be no budget for foreign aid and on top of all the above, corporations would have de facto legislative power (As if they don't have enough influence now.) A true free market would be a step towards the widening of the gap between the rich and poor and is clearly a step in the wrong direction. A cold dark fascist despotic nightmare where social darwinism reigns and the exploitation of the working class gos unregulated and the homless perish in the streets.
Suppose you go to Washington and try to get at your government. You will always find that while you are politely listened to, the men really consulted are the men who have the big stake--the big bankers, the big manufacturers and the big masters of commerce…. The masters of the government of the United States are the combined capitalists and manufacturers of the United States. - Woodrow Wilson