It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HotSauce
reply to post by ModernAcademia
I usually agree with you, but I just can't on this one. Why would they bust her if she wasn't guilty. She is a woman with a bunch of kids, so now they had to pay out to try her and held her in prison. What would they gain from this if she wasn't guilty. It isn't like Britain isn't already chalk full of Muslims already. Now if she was the first one coming over to live there or visit then you might have a case, but truth is the Muslims are about to overrun all of Europe by reprouction and democracy.
The case concerned the seizure of Osama Moustafa Hassan Nasr, also known as Abu Omar, and his transfer to Egypt, where he claims he was tortured.
All of the Americans were tried in absentia, with 22 sentenced to five years in jail and Robert Seldon Lady, the Milan CIA station chief, handed eight years in prison.
Two Italians were given three-year prison terms.
Citing diplomatic immunity, Judge Oscar Magi told the Milan courtroom on Wednesday that he was acquitting three other Americans.
Five Italians, including Nicolo Pollari, the former head of Italy's Sismi military intelligence service, and Marco Mancini, his ex-deputy, were acquitted, with Magi saying that the men were protected by state secrecy rules.
Lawyers for the 23 Americans said they would appeal against their convictions.
"I was brutally tortured and I could hear the screams of others who were tortured too"
Originally posted by HotSauce
reply to post by oozyism
The question is what would they gain for doing this. They have to pay to convict her, pay to incarcerate her, pay to take care of her kids while she is in jail if her family isn't in the country. What do they gain by convicting her, if she isn't guilty?
Politically motivated, 2 years is nothing, they have killed thousands of innocent people, giving a lady 2 years in the anti-terror squad is doing a huge good, because it will bring about a law which will allow the authorities to search through your personal files. It is a means of justification.
Originally posted by HotSauce
reply to post by oozyism
The question is what would they gain for doing this. They have to pay to convict her, pay to incarcerate her, pay to take care of her kids while she is in jail if her family isn't in the country. What do they gain by convicting her, if she isn't guilty?
Originally posted by HotSauce
reply to post by oozyism
So if what you are saying is correct, then why didnn't they just scream gun or bomb and plug her full of holes and been done with it?
2) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, hateful, intolerant, bigoted and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.
Her parents, carnival workers, had left Likens and her sister Jenny in the care of the Baniszewski family three months before her death in exchange for $20 a week. Baniszewski, two of her children, Paula and John, and two neighbor youths, Coy Hubbard and Richard Hobbs, were charged and convicted of the crime. Her torture and murder were described by the prosecutor in Baniszewski's trial as "the most terrible crime ever committed in the state of Indiana.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Those types of thoughts represent a clear and present danger Tezz. There are some things that are simply 'wrong'. It's hardly the line of thinking we should be promoting.
Originally posted by HotSauce
reply to post by oozyism
So you are saying they can plant a usb drive on her and get fake letters where she says she is going to use her and her kids as suicide bombers, but they cannot plant a bomb or gun on her without getting busted?
Do you see how I have a hard time seeing your side of the story. This is like a black man screaming racism everytime he gets caught with a bunch of weed.
Originally posted by dooper
Well, Jesus Christ! Look at her photo!
Originally posted by dooper
To make it worse, she was acting strange, nervous.
Originally posted by dooper
Let's see. She's dressed in a burkha, she's nervous, she's acting strange, she makes some furtive movements, and something falls out.
I am sure she had an attorney, and she did confess.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to
See you are also making assumptions to come to your own conclusion, under anti-terror law they are not allowed an attorny, they can be question without an attorny for 40 days.
The court heard that Chentouf, who has addresses in Manchester and The Hague, has a mental illness triggered by the death of a family member, and had previously tried to harm herself.
Originally posted by oozyism
Is it wrong to hold your beliefs while you are fighting, it is called moral support(since we all know they don't have millitary support)? Yes no one agrees in the deaths of innocent people, but hey who isn't doing it these days for political means? Are you telling me America is not responsible for the deaths of thousands of Muslims? Innocent Muslims? Are you telling me Europe isn't responsible for the deaths of thousands of Muslims? Innocent Muslims? For political means?
Yes and those kinds of people exist in every society, including Democratic, should we demonize all Democracy sympathizers? Communists have already been demonized in the West, and thousands have died in response, thousands of innocent people, because of that Demonization. Should we continue an idiotic cultural behavior which has caused more harm than good? You can't blame Islam or the whole Muslim population for the actions of some bad seeds.
The difference between my view and yours is clear from what I can read, you believe Muslims are being demonized because of some in their population willing to kill innocent people to accomplish their goals, but don't care to mention that there is something more sinister at hand, for example the middle east situation, and the colonization of middle east by America.
You can't expect to get away with colonization. People will fight, and people are fighting, with any means necessary, whether that be suicide bombing, or roadside bombings. They are fighting back, and they want to bring the fight to your land, as much as you want to take the fight to their land.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
If it was planted, why would she admit to it? She probably didn't have much choice because some of the documents she had were handwritten, and it probably wouldn't have been difficult to show they were in her handwriting.
There may be some false flags somewhere but this isn't one of them.