It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chiron613
The current theory is called "punctuated equilibrium". Life remains essentially stable for long periods of time, very little evolution or genetic changes happening. Then some major upheaval causes massive changes in the environment. There are large species die-offs, many species going extinct, and some new species appearing suddenly.
Everything your saying does make sense, I couldn't argue any of this if I wanted to.
on the other hand, you could also argue that we know the universe is huge, we know there are an almost infinite number of suns and a lot of these suns have planets. we know that it has been here for billions of years.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by pieman
kind of a mute point then huh? But wouldn't something have to
put the language tobether?
Not even looking for an arguement just real discussion.
[edit on 21-10-2009 by randyvs]
So basically, you don't want to hear that your source is biased. Too bad. It is. And no where in that article does it do anything to prove god or debunk evolution.
There is no such thing as a missing link of any kind or sort, that is a common misconception argued by creationists
But why do you consider it designed?
Evolution IS a Scientific Fact.