It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The stunning revelation emerged Thursday in a report from the Pentagon to House officials. The information conveyed offers new insight into a recent report by the Congressional Research Service, which found that the US spends $1 million per year for each servicemember on the ground in Afghanistan.
Why so much? The cost includes shipping, which sometimes includes the pricetag of a helicopter flight. Sending fuel by helicopter is woefully inefficient, because it uses up almost as much fuel as...
The government's Defense Energy Support Center provides fuel to the military at $2.78 per gallon, the conveyance of which then grows exponentially more expensive as it travels through dangerous combat zones.
Gen. James Conway, who runs the Marine Corps, told a Navy forum that perilous risky routes up gasoline that originally cost $1.04 gallon up to $400.
“These are fairly major problems for us,” Conway was quoted as saying.
...which found that the US spends $1 million per year for each servicemember on the ground in Afghanistan.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Because I don't see any other reasons in the first place we should have ever even been IN Afghanistan.
Mr. Wheeler, who conducted the study, compared the Obama administration's requests for funds with the $636 billion spending bill that the Senate passed. He discovered that senators added $2.6 billion in pet projects while spending $4 billion less than the administration requested for fiscal 2010, which began Oct. 1.
Mr. Wheeler said that senators took most of the cash for the projects from the "operations and maintenance" or O&M accounts.
"These are the accounts that pay for troop training, repairs, spares and supplies for vehicles, weapons, ships and planes, food and fuel," Mr. Wheeler said.
Raiding those accounts to fund big-ticket projects the military does not want, but that benefit senators' home states or campaign contributors, amounts to "rancid gluttony," he said.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Good replies you guys, thanks.
lol @ Federal Express.
It might be curious, just for comparison's sakes, what the total cost of gas per gallon was, all things inclusive, for any of the other wars, like WWII for example- and adjusted for inflation. Or maybe even the Gulf War. Korea? Vietnam?
I mean why does this seem so ridiculously absurd?
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Excellent, PT!
To me that makes all the sense in the world. And by now, with all the other stories that have surfaced over the years of stupid, insane government spending (you know, the $100.00 hammer stories)- the public is used to it already at large. So what's another story of $400.00/gallon? Just the cost of doing business. Because that's what war is- a business to them.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Basically when you get right down to it the entire wealth of the United States is being siphoned out through the Military Industrial Complex.
"What is the greatest threat facing us now?" Powell asked. "People will say it’s terrorism. But are there any terrorists in the world who can change the American way of life or our political system? No. ... The only thing that can really destroy us is us. We shouldn’t do it to ourselves, and we shouldn’t use fear for political purposes—scaring people to death so they will vote for you, or scaring people to death so that we create a terror-industrial complex."