It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While Boeing continues installation of the 787 wing fix, engineers have returned to the drawing board to redesign a crucial portion of the reinforcement, Flightglobal affiliate FlightBlogger reports.
As a result, sources say the 2009 first flight target could be in jeopardy as engineers work to redesign the fix for four remaining wing stringers.
Originally posted by ecoparity
The Airbus may fly first but based on past history it will probably also suffer the first crash. I haven't really studied the statistics but I do seem to have this perception that quite a few Airbus jets have crashed which have been relatively new planes.
It would lead one to certain conclusions about the process for working all the bugs out of them extending into live service.
It looks like the Airbus A310 is #4 for highest crash rate, far above the rates for all of the Boeing planes.
Originally posted by C0bzz
I don't see the 787, or A350 going down, for a long, long time.
It looks like the Airbus A310 is #4 for highest crash rate, far above the rates for all of the Boeing planes
Originally posted by kilcoo316
It'll be a long time before I (and an awful lot of fellow aero engs. I know) get on either.
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by ecoparity
It looks like the Airbus A310 is #4 for highest crash rate, far above the rates for all of the Boeing planes
and if you look at the causes you`ll see 50% of the accidents are pilot error - like allowing a child to fly the aircraft , or flying into a maountain , or flying into the sea after misreading the ILS
The one thing that bothers me about the Airbus plane is that when one does go down (and one will, sooner or later) the loss of life is just going to be horrendous.