It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


links and videos disappearing?? have anyone else noticed this?

page: 1
<<   2 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 07:04 AM
of issues that are of interest if research 20 deep and have found:

and when i clicked onto the url i got this: Forbidden You don't have permission to access / on this server. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/2.2.11 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 DAV/2 mod_auth_passthrough/2.1 mod_bwlimited/1.4 FrontPage/ Server at Port 80 so all the links now are unaccessable. hum? funny how links are just disappearing before out very "click."

and on the thread just posted a video link to Lou Dobbs: The Immorality of Illegal Immigration was just removed for violation of terms of use.

is it just me or are certain links mysteriously disappearing and internet access slowly being limited?

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 07:11 AM
reply to post by musselwhite

Yes I have noticed that links are being removed.

Especially links with information that is controversial.

Not on ATS however, but the sites that are linked.

In a world that is full of regulation, anyone that believes the internet will not be regulated is kidding themselves in my opinion.

[edit on 15-10-2009 by XXXN3O]

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 07:34 AM
Try researching obama.
you won't see anything he doesn't want you to see.

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 07:34 AM
reply to post by XXXN3O
although i noticed it in prior searches i have noticed it happening at such a faster rate now especially researching the arab connection on the american police force in montana thread so much so i had to search even deeper. some links showed up altered.

and on the aj charlie sheen/obama supposed interview. i had just read the original that did not contain the footnote.

so it has begun or begun at a more noticeable rate. internet policing.

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 07:54 AM
reply to post by genius/idoit
i used to research obama but find it hard to even look at his face or listen to all the double talk.

can you be more specific on certain links that have suddenly disappeared?

on some links i found the originals altered and altered quick so i think it important we start our own inventory of snapshots and copying of important videos.

so, we are slowly being flanked on all sides, huh?

i also believe this site is being watched closely.

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 07:57 AM
reply to post by musselwhite

This is a new thread and it is riddled with them I also recall the Orly Taitz debacle.
I would post more but have to go to work.

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 08:02 AM

Originally posted by musselwhite
reply to post by genius/idoit

i also believe this site is being watched closely.

You believe?

I would rephrase that as know in my opinion.

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 08:11 AM
reply to post by XXXN3O
you are right about that..............."know" is a better word. there are some posters i have questioned being connected w/a greater more powerful law enforcement that keep track.

still, i post here my opinion as i think it is important on some issues. i may have made a huge mistake but then again, one must seek out the truth in order to prepare for what, imho, is happening as i type this post.

i fear for the majority of the american people who do not research. how will they come to believe or prepare if they do not search for the truth?

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 08:22 AM
I think it's about time to relocate the data on servers outside the US like in Japan or Korea. I heard that the bandwidth there is over the roof.

Then again, maybe Obama's nefarious, Kenyan-born left hand has already corrupted those countries beyond redemption.

Edit: changed right to left hand.

[edit on 15-10-2009 by Unregistered]

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 09:06 AM
reply to post by Unregistered

how in the world would you begin to accomplish this? i'm a computer moron.

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 09:37 AM
I think everyone is starting to notice this. Does anyone have any guesses as when the internet will be completly filtered?

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 09:41 AM
you wanna try posting links that prove jim oberg wrong. espeially nasa ones.

they have a life span of 6 hours max.

posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 09:46 AM
reply to post by KITNO

there is a s773 bill introduced to protect free flow but hey the healthcare reform was not blocked so why should this bill be blocked

A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and exploitation of the Internet and intranet communications for such purposes, to provide for the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to improve and maintain effective cybersecurity defenses against disruption, and for other purposes.

posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 08:11 AM
i keep finding:

Not Found The requested URL /images/wonk/VariousMovies3/ was not found on this server. Apache/2.0.54 Server at Port 80

while trying to read US war crimes - Convoy of Death here on ats

this is becoming so frustrating. i really have no way of saving data.

posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 08:34 AM
If TPTB are just restricting the sites and not deleting them, then even a moderately skilled hacker could bypass that.

It seems like the boiling frog analogy does it not? Like how you can't say god damn on tv without "god" getting bleeped but the curse word "damn" stays.

Only the smart people notice these kinds of things as not being a coincidence but pure design, my question is why some of them get deleted. I've read YouTube's TOS and a lot of controverial videos didn't meet the delete criteria.

posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 08:43 AM
reply to post by Genus
sometimes i can find a link thru a back door but it takes me hours and yes i agree about the youtube videos that are removed due to "terms of use" violation.

i've read their terms of use violation agreement and it is quite vague to say the least and, imho, the term is used to violate freedom of speech and takes away my right to my own opinion. freedom of information.

btw, can you help w/the hacking? ha ha ha ha give me a short 101 lesson for dummies?

posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 08:48 AM
reply to post by manxman2
i have no idea who jim oberg is but i can assure you i would like to know so off i go.

i love to dig and i thank you for yet another direction and some more interesting knowledge i can file in my brain. my only problem i can no longer find where i filed i have bookmarks.

posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 08:50 AM
I would love to help but since I know the internet is monitered (not just this site, EVERY site.) there's no way i'd actually type out instructions on it, not unless I want the FBI knocking on my door you know? :-p

The best hackers are the ones that make people go "WTF??"

posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 09:06 AM
reply to post by musselwhite

i had to search even deeper. some links showed up altered.

No you are not paranoid THEY are out to get us!

In the fight against NAIS - Animal ID, farmers found this happening all the time. The USDA had the "NAIS Users Manual" up on line. When farmers started quoting specific passages to get their point across the USDA took the Users Manual off line and then called farmers "misinformation agents"

"There is a great deal of misinformation regarding the NAIS that has and continues to be spread throughout the horse industry" say Jim Morehead, DVM

USDA Internal Handbook Advises Animal-Identification Staff to Address Farmers “at the Sixth Grade Level”

The USDA’s confidential “NAIS How-To Handbook,” intended for non-public distribution to Federal and State NAIS personnel, reveals an aggressive campaign to implement NAIS in the face of farmer opposition by strictly controlling communications, manipulating media coverage, concealing the original NAIS program documents, and discrediting opponents.

.....The USDA’s Handbook repeatedly refers to NAIS opponents’ “misinformation,” but fails to specify any statement of the opponents that is other than completely accurate. The USDA’s most detailed list of “opposition” statements, on pp. 23-24 of the Handbook, dates from January through August 2006 and does not identify any specific individuals as sources for the statements. The websites from which the statements are taken permit comments and postings by visitors, and the USDA’s quotations are not attributed to random visitors, more formal opposition statements, or any other particular source. One statement, the last under “Theme 3: Civil Liberties” (p. 23), obviously refers to the Real ID Act (a common ancillary topic of discussion on many NAIS opposition sites), and not to NAIS at all. Indeed, nearly all the statements the USDA quotes under “Opposition Themes” (pp. 23-24) are in fact quite accurate for their time frame of Jan. - Aug. 2006. During those months, the operative NAIS documents were the Draft Strategic Plan and Draft Program Standards, which did indeed impose a fully mandatory NAIS by 2008/2009 and did indeed require the participation of all common livestock species, the microchip or RFID individual identification of nearly all animals except factory-farm chickens and pigs, and the reporting of all animal “movements” and changes of status (birth, death, sale, purchase, slaughter, and all travel off-premises) within 24 hours. Only in subsequent documents did the USDA begin to waver as to some of the original requirements of the Draft Strategic Plan. And not until the USDA’s release of the User Guide in November 2006 did the USDA’s stated policy become “voluntary” rather than “mandatory” NAIS.

by Mary Zanoni, Ph.D., J.D.

If you want to know who controls the USDA look here and NAIS is traced to NAII and the World Trade Organization.

The NGO responsible for NAIS and Premises- ID is the NIAA or National Institute for Animal Agriculture. The membership is large producers, veterinarians, scientists, government representatives and allied industries. In 2002, the National Institute of Animal Agriculture (NIAA) began a major push for NAIS. [This was BEFORE the Canadian BSE cow]
Notice that the majority of the members are the very ones who stand to profit. Tag makers, and large producers who do not have to tag animals, they can use one number per herd. Small Farmers must tag every animal. What does this mean in terms of animals actually tagged vs the whole population?
The following chart was presented at the 2008 NIAA Annual Meeting

In the U.S .Today… Chart of top producers
– The top ten food retailers sell more than 75% of food.
– The top ten chicken companies produce 79% of chicken.
– The top 50 dairy cooperatives produce 79% of the milk. [9.1 million milk cows]
– The top 60 egg companies produce 85% of eggs.
– The top 20 pork producers produce more than 50% of pork. [63 million hogs]
Two percent of pork producers produce 80% [57,000 producers 2% is 1140 producers]
– The top 10 pork packers process 87% of pork.
The top four beef packers process more than 80% of beef [97 million beef cattle]

You will notice around 80% of the animals are owned by less than 100 producers in each category except pork where it is 1000 producers yet there are over 2 million farms (US Ag. Census 2005).
This means over 80% of the animals in the USA do not have to be tagged. Large commercial herds do not have to tag their animals only small family farmers have to individually tag animals. Yet millions of dollars of tax payer money are being spent by the USDA to implement the ideas of those few INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS not effected law.

edit to add link I forgot.
USDA control [url=]here[/url ]

[edit on 16-10-2009 by crimvelvet]

posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 09:43 AM
reply to post by Genus

ha ha ha ha. yes, every site is monitored. i do much reading on the net and links take me to other links that take me to other links that eventually get me around to forming my own conclusion about issues.

i even got a uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown. (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer) Secure Connection Failed uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown. (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer) * This could be a problem with the server's configuration, or it could be someone trying to impersonate the server. * If you have connected to this server successfully in the past, the error may be temporary, and you can try again later.

sorry about the link failure seems it got lost somewhere in my research:

i mean this is/was a link to the king's bay naval base in georgia!!!!!!

top topics

<<   2 >>

log in