It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
Whoa! I thought this thread interesting because it descibes a life style choice as being a negative if you decide to donate blood.
Why all the anger?
Originally posted by mikerussellus
Why all the anger?
Your allegations are as imflamatory as those you rail against.
Originally posted by dbates
Do I have any diseases, do I feel healthy, do I use drugs or share needles? Have I had a tattoo within the last year? Have I paid for sexual acts?
Originally posted by niteboy82
I have actually seen the documents at the blood bank here and it specifies anal intercourse with a member of the same sex. To make this a blanket "homosexual" issue is false
Originally posted by dbates
It's almost as if this were a manufactured societal problem isn't it? It's fascinating because when it comes down to actual medical science there's no contesting that homosexuality is a serious health risk to the individuals partaking in that lifestyle. Yet there's this false sense of urgency to silence all those who voice their opinions against it.
Originally posted by dbates
You see, even when one merely points out the medical disadvantages of a behavior.
After all of that people will still come out of the woodwork and blast your ideas as bigoted and hate mongering.
It's almost as if this were a manufactured societal problem isn't it? It's fascinating because when it comes down to actual medical science there's no contesting that homosexuality is a serious health risk to the individuals partaking in that lifestyle. Yet there's this false sense of urgency to silence all those who voice their opinions against it.
Originally posted by rogerstigers
I have plenty of friends who are gay.
Originally posted by niteboy82
Darwinism at it's best.
Dr De Cock, an epidemiologist who has spent much of his career leading the battle against the disease (AIDS), said understanding of the threat posed by the virus had changed. Whereas once it was seen as a risk to populations everywhere, it was now recognised that, outside sub-Saharan Africa, it was confined to high-risk groups including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers and their clients.
www.independent.co.uk
Originally posted by dbates
On the matter tying homosexuality to drug use and prostitution, it was the Dr De Cock of the WHO that made that statement. Not I. The statement stands alone with no support from myself or others.
Dr De Cock, an epidemiologist who has spent much of his career leading the battle against the disease (AIDS), said understanding of the threat posed by the virus had changed. Whereas once it was seen as a risk to populations everywhere, it was now recognised that, outside sub-Saharan Africa, it was confined to high-risk groups including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers and their clients.
www.independent.co.uk
Originally posted by rogerstigers
You are pointing out that you have "medical evidence", but I have yet to see you post any.
Originally posted by rogerstigers
I also don't see any acknowledgement from you that heterosexual sex is also "risky".