It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On the last day of Kent Schaible's life, his parents and pastor intensely prayed over his 32-pound body, which, unbeknown to them, was ravaged by bacterial pneumonia.
When the 2-year-old boy finally died at 9:30 p.m. Jan. 24 inside the family's Northeast Philadelphia home, the pastor called a funeral director to take the boy's remains to the Philadelphia Medical Examiner's Office.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
It's about time this was stopped. Look i'm all for religious freedom but when it results in the death of a person i think it needs to be prevented. Religion has absolutely no place in medicine or medicial decisions. If the person whos life is in danger decides themselves then that's fine, if they're underage and the parents are making the decision then absolutely not!
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
I just don't get how society sees this as acceptable. The parents gave this child a death sentence. They will of course claim that god decided to kill the child and it was his time, yeah at two years old that's his time . My original point remains though, if god really, really wanted this child dead then surely he wouldn't fear doctors? If god can make the univferse then i'm pretty sure he can counter man made medicine and make sure the child dies anyway.
So why not just take the kid to a hospital and let god work against the doctors? No parent has the right, religious or not to hand a death sentence to their child!
Originally posted by LiquidLight
Some would say that the parents being incompetent was in God's plan for this child. I'm not defending what they did, only observing that in life you have inevitibilities that neither you or I can change.
Originally posted by LiquidLight
I fully believe that the course of the Universe was decided at its conception, and any decisions we seem to make are mere illusions. Does that mean people shouldn't be held accountable for their misdeeds? Of course it doesn't. We may be mere actors in a play that was written at the dawn of time, but for the sake of our sanity we must play our roles like finely trained thespians.
Originally posted by budro
Come on guys, cant we leave the weaker alone to die or do we have to perpetually protect them from themselves.
So we stop a baby death, but did we stop the continuation of a set of human DNA that would be best left alone?
I am a believer in Christ (Far from ur typical) but I do not discount the fact that nature has a way of keeping things in line and if we keep on nurturing the weak, we all become weak.
Originally posted by Miraj
Cases like this are.. complex.
I personally think that these people did everything wrong for their child.
But they don't. Which means that they were incapable of making a decision for their child. Due to their religion.
So if the state acts does it then become: Religious discrimination (because this is what the parent wishes for their child based on religion. or is it the state protecting an individual.
I'd go with the govt. acting in the interests of the welfare of the child.
However since they were incompetent in this case, is it OK to prosecute them for a decision that they were unable to make?
With modern medicine this boy could have easily lived. It seems sad to me.