It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court revived the legal battle over gun rights in America, saying it would decide whether the constitutional right of individuals to own firearms trumped state and local laws.
In a brief order on Wednesday, the court said it would settle the question by ruling in a dispute over a strict gun control law in Chicago that bans the ownership of handguns in most cases.
Individuals and gun rights groups had challenged the law.
Eighty percent of Chicago's 510 murders in 2008 were committed with guns -- among them 34 Chicago schoolchildren.
Gun control advocates said the decision was no surprise. They expected the court would merely reinforce last year's ruling upholding a constitutional right to bear arms narrowly limited to guns in the home for self-defense.
The Chicago metropolitan area increased by nearly 73,000 people from July 2007 to July 2008, making the population 9.6 million.
Chicago had the seventh-largest population increase in the country, according to the Census.
Cook County, home to Chicago, was the second-most populous county in the country, with 5.3 million residents.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
Originally posted by phi1618
well its in the constitution which should hold priority over everything.
i do however believe in some rules, but if you are a law abiding citizen there should be no limits on your personal arsenal.
Originally posted by December_Rain
Originally posted by phi1618
well its in the constitution which should hold priority over everything.
i do however believe in some rules, but if you are a law abiding citizen there should be no limits on your personal arsenal.
Dont agree to that. Human beings are impredictable animals, you will not know when someone snaps and go crazy as happenned in many school attacks. Anyway, if one is law abiding citizens they wont have a need for unlimited arsenal. You can't buy AK-47's or kalashnikovs lol just coz you think you are law abiding. There should be a limit to fire arm.
Imo a person should be issued a firearm if he can prove he is in some major risk-like rich businessman, merchants, traders, jewellery showroom owners, high ranking officials etc or someone who received threat to life or people who are in security business like guards etc. Otherwise all fire arms should be banned from public.
Originally posted by December_Rain
Originally posted by phi1618
well its in the constitution which should hold priority over everything.
i do however believe in some rules, but if you are a law abiding citizen there should be no limits on your personal arsenal.
Dont agree to that. Human beings are impredictable animals, you will not know when someone snaps and go crazy as happenned in many school attacks. Anyway, if one is law abiding citizens they wont have a need for unlimited arsenal. You can't buy AK-47's or kalashnikovs lol just coz you think you are law abiding. There should be a limit to fire arm.
Imo a person should be issued a firearm if he can prove he is in some major risk-like rich businessman, merchants, traders, jewellery showroom owners, high ranking officials etc or someone who received threat to life or people who are in security business like guards etc. Otherwise all fire arms should be banned from public.
Originally posted by December_Rain
Dont agree to that. Human beings are impredictable animals, you will not know when someone snaps and go crazy as happenned in many school attacks. Anyway, if one is law abiding citizens they wont have a need for unlimited arsenal. You can't buy AK-47's or kalashnikovs lol just coz you think you are law abiding. There should be a limit to fire arm.
Imo a person should be issued a firearm if he can prove he is in some major risk-like rich businessman, merchants, traders, jewellery showroom owners, high ranking officials etc or someone who received threat to life or people who are in security business like guards etc. Otherwise all fire arms should be banned from public.
Originally posted by December_Rain
. You can't buy AK-47's or kalashnikovs lol just coz you think you are law abiding. There should be a limit to fire arm.
Imo a person should be issued a firearm if he can prove he is in some major risk-like rich businessman, merchants, traders, jewellery showroom owners, high ranking officials etc or someone who received threat to life or people who are in security business like guards etc. Otherwise all fire arms should be banned from public.