It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
Originally posted by hooper
In fact, which is more likely - the passport survived and was found or everyone in all levels of government is capable of being a cold blooded murderer?
Don't use weak straw man arguments. You discredit yourself when you do so and make yourself a target. By using such pathetic arguments you've identified yourself as one of two things. You are either a genuine paid shill, or you have serious deficiencies in your ability to reason and use logic, deficiencies which are common, but not limited to, people with extra chromosomes.
I'd love to believe the official story, but its defenders often use arguments which appeal to the lowest common denominator, and that's really suspect.
Originally posted by hooper
There are a number of ways, the detective in question may have been in uniform, may have been wearing a "POLICE" jacket like we have all seen or may have been displaying his badge as is common in a public situation. Might have been sitting in a marked police car, may have been talking to uniform officers and on and on and on.
There is no fire during a reentry, get your facts straight, there is only ablation.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
A missile can weave around walls and columns?
Is it a nanomissile?
Seriously though, you should learn to spell jeopardy if you're going to use it to mock and patronise people.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by JPhish
I wish you would make up your mind....
Your words....
There is no fire during a reentry, get your facts straight, there is only ablation.
I have my facts straight. Columbia burned up on re-entry and its interior contents were subjected to FIRE.
Originally posted by SPreston
The Satam al-Suqami paper passport was allegedly found by a stranger and handed to a NYPD detective who of course neglected to get the stranger's name and address.
But of course there is no chance it was a 9-11 perp handing over the unblemished paper passport is there?
But the duhbunkers and government loyalists and shills all believe this is a perfectly normal way to gather criminal evidence from complete strangers, and would never suspect an unsinged unburned not even smudged paper passport which just survived an explosive fireball supposedly inside the pocket of an alleged hijacker inside the fuselage of a burning aircraft.
Isn't FAITH just grand? Aren't 9-11 MIRACLES just wonderful?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/429f56b0257d.jpg[/atsimg]
Larger version
Passport exterior cover
It is reported that the passport of hijacker Satam Al Suqami has been found a few blocks from the World Trade Center. [ABC News, 9/12/2001; Associated Press, 9/16/2001; ABC News, 9/16/2001] Barry Mawn, the director of the FBI’s New York office, says police and FBI found it during a “grid search” of the area. [CNN, 9/18/2001] However a senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission later claims it was actually discovered by a passerby and given to an NYPD detective, “shortly before the World Trade Center towers collapsed.”
source
Originally posted by Orion7911
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
A missile can weave around walls and columns?
Is it a nanomissile?
Seriously though, you should learn to spell jeopardy if you're going to use it to mock and patronise people.
simple typo... but then now that you want to get petty, you should learn to spell patroniZe if you're going to use it to nit-pick and be sarcastic. The primary correct spelling is with a Z.
and whats the point of your "missle can weave" issue have to do with anything being argued?
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by hooper
There are a number of ways, the detective in question may have been in uniform, may have been wearing a "POLICE" jacket like we have all seen or may have been displaying his badge as is common in a public situation. Might have been sitting in a marked police car, may have been talking to uniform officers and on and on and on.
Boy. It sure would be nice to know these details. Shouldn't there be a police log somewhere describing the situation where the most important piece of evidence came from? And exactly how it was obtained?
[edit on 24-9-2009 by Nutter]
Originally posted by hooper
Why?
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by hooper
Why?
Because there is protocol to gathering evidence.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by hooper
Who cares. It's absurd, on the face of it.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by hooper
That it made it through the cataclysm from the pocket of the allged pilot, to land in near prestine condition a few blocks from the WTC, yes, is rather asburd, don't you think?
To me, as part of the scripting of 9/11, it's purpose appears to be to re-inforce that a hijacker was piloting the aircraft, otherwise, how would his passport end up near the WTC..?
What so sad, are the lengths to which well researched and otherwise sane, and rational people will go, to actively DEFEND the OS, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, to allow one's own intellectual integrity to be violated like that, and then spend a lot of time and energy in DEFENCE of the OS - sigh.. let's just say that's not the kind of thing I'd ever want to be involved with, not once I've done the research and have a pretty good idea of what it could very well be that I'm actively supporting and defending. And this passport thing is a perfect example of that.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Is it possible that the 9/11 truth movement is mostly right?
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Is it possible that the 9/11 truth movement is mostly right?
This has a much lower probability factor than the passport making it through WTC1 undamaged.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
And why is that?