It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But first, the idea must overcome skepticism from the very newspapers that stand to benefit. Critics say endowments also could beholden newspapers to their large donors, and giving newspapers tax-exempt status could restrict them from endorsing candidates and running editorials on pending legislation.
On a more practical level, skeptics question whether the millions and millions of dollars needed to create such endowments could be raised during the worst recession in decades.
An endowment might not help preserve a newspaper's printed edition, but could save core, expensive functions such as investigative reporting and foreign correspondents as newspapers transition to the Internet, said Steven Coll, former managing editor of The Washington Post and now president of the New America Foundation think tank.
Consider the St. Petersburg Times, which has no endowment but is owned by a nonprofit group, Poynter. The newspaper has had to trim newsroom staff to about 300, down from 430 at the end of the 1990s. Another Poynter unit, Congressional Quarterly Inc., is up for sale.
Swensen, who declined to comment beyond his column in the Times, estimates a large newspaper such as the Times would need a $5 billion endowment, assuming a 5 percent annual payout from the fund, to support annual costs of $200 million. Smaller papers would need less.
He acknowledges that only a handful of foundations and wealthy individuals have the money required for such endowments.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by mental modulator
Charles Rangel, Tim Geitner are in charge of the IRS.
Suuuuure, they'll keep it legit.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by mental modulator
Charles Rangel has been "connected" to over a million dollars "cheat" on his taxes.
link
www.washingtonexaminer.com...
Tim Geitner? You know, the guy in charge of the IRS who doesn't know Turbo-Tax?
Originally posted by hangedman13
reply to post by mental modulator
What do you suppose is the real purpose of keeping newspapers afloat? The younger generations barely read as it is and fewer and fewer people do not own or at least use a computer. Changing their status to non-profit seems pointless really.
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
REMINDER
Please stay on topic.....the newspaper bailout.
Thanks.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by mental modulator
Not Yet.
Caviet.
In a follow-up essay to the CAP report entitled "Forget the Fairness Doctrine," Lloyd specifically instructs liberal activists to do the latter - use the "localism" requirement to harass conservative stations by filing complaints with the FCC. The FCC would then assess these stations fines, with the money going to (very liberal) public broadcasting.
In Venezuela, with Chavez really had an incredible revolution, a democratic revolution, and to begin to put in place, saying that we’re going to have an impact on the people of Venezuela, the property owners and the folks who were then controlling the media in Venezuela rebelled. Worked, frankly, with the folks here in the U.S. government, worked to oust him and came back had another revolution. And Chavez then started to take the media very seriously in this country.”