It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SharkBait
reply to post by Pauligirl
To answer your questions as to how God thinks and the reason he does something, I would think that’s a little above us.
But I can say that in Gods word, he gave us the ability to accept or reject him. This has nothing to do with Adam and Eve but it has got everything to do with what you and I do. Its really up to you to decide what you want to do. You don’t have to accept God or Jesus, you have that right, the Bible says so.
With Adam and Eve –its all about Obedience. Its was a simple instruction. If you wanted God to control the situation we would not be free and have the will power to make up our own destination. Many people want God to control them like puppets and then will blame God for things that go wrong.
[edit on 20-9-2009 by SharkBait]
Originally posted by Nichiren
reply to post by Pauligirl
Sounds plausible to me, but what about the divine part of the Scripture? Did divinity fail logic at that point or is logic highly overrated?
I have a feeling it all boils down to having blind faith in the Scripture.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Pauligirl
just out of curiosity, do you believe gilgamesh existed ?
this question has an interesting direction
Originally posted by Pauligirl
I don't do well at blind faith. I tend to peek.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Pauligirl
define demi-god?
i think what's happened is, the schools of higher learning have made as many assumptions about the ancient past as they claim the religions have done. fact o' the matter is, none of us were there. it's about as scientific as a parade of pink elephants to assume something doesn't and never has existed based on lack of personal frame of reference. they've dropped the ball on that more than once, such as the commentary that it's not possible for the people, angels, gods, whatever, to fly in the sky, therefore such and such a story is a myth. then it happens. that women can't get pregnant any other way than sexual intercourse. then someone creates artificial insemination. there's many such examples. heck wasn't that long ago, they swore up and down that the bible couldn't possibly be anything but a fairy tale because there were no documents from that area that corroborated it. and then, they found the epic of gilgamesh, the enuma elish, and so on. never say never.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Nichiren
i mean there's many possible explanations for all ancient histories, including the egyptian, grecian, norse, mesopotamian, chinese and so on. they teach in public schools that these are all myths. that's becoming more and more unlikely as the research and artifacts come up out of the ground. instead of archaeology disproving the ancient past as told by our ancient ancestors, it's proving it. that we don't understand the context or strange stories in genesis does not mean they never happened or that we are even capable of knowing what really happened beyond what it says at this juncture. could be just a whole lot of assumptions that are the problem... if'n ya know what i mean.
Another is to serve as a polemic against Egyptian and Babylonian cosmologies. In other words, it wasn't the Annunaki or Egyptian gods who created us, but Yahweh...the God of Israel.
. they teach in public schools that these are all myths. that's becoming more and more unlikely as the research and artifacts come up out of the ground. instead of archaeology disproving the ancient past as told by our ancient ancestors, it's proving it
yahweh is jehovah. he's enlil. remember enlil? well his name is etymologically attached to enlil,
Originally posted by WalterRatlos
Originally posted by Nichiren
Here is another conundrum for me. Since God is omnipotent and omniscient He knew that planting the tree of knowledge would result in the serpent making the move. He also knew that Eve wasn't able to resist the temptation.
I asked in my first post: why did God set up his own children for failure and then acts totally surprised?
I'd be curious how Christians would answer this, though I have a hunch that they will try to explain it away as test (the OT God loved to test the faith of his believers) which Eve and then Adam failed miserably. From my point of view the explanation is simple, if you ask yourself: what is the purpose of this particular story? Well, it explains how sin came to be and who's to blame for it (the serpent, Eve, Adam) in that order of gravity. Of course it was mighty convenient that the people of that time could point fingers at Eve for being seduced and then seducing herself Adam, because that was used (and is still being used in some fundamentalist churches) to treat women less than men and to subdue them to men's will.