Proof that wtc 7 was brought down by controlled demolition! must see

Here is a video of Larry Silverstein admitting that he made the descion to pull wtc 7 which means bring it down with a controlled demoltion

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 17/9/09 by taylor101]

gday mate,
Great topic indeed, but if you use the search function at the top right corner you will find a tonne of threads on this very subject, covered with detail.

Its ok, your new to ATS, enjoy

You guys keep posting all this 'proof', yet not a single conspirator has come forward with evidence of a demolition job. Why is that? Surely someone would have come forward by now.

Originally posted by stevegmu
You guys keep posting all this 'proof', yet not a single conspirator has come forward with evidence of a demolition job. Why is that? Surely someone would have come forward by now.

www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by stevegmu
...yet not a single conspirator has come forward with evidence of a demolition job. Why is that?

Ya think it could have something to do them getting into a wee bit of trouble???

reply to post by Mark_Amy


No, actually they would be protected by whistle-blower laws, or a large media outlet, who has the money to protect them.

reply to post by ugie1028


You may have posted the wrong clip. I didn't see an interview with a demolition expert, or even just s helper, who said he set the charges.

thought I would cross link to this interesting and related thread: Uncommon Video on WTC 7 Demolition: Can There Now Be Any Doubt?

reply to post by stevegmu


There's a security guy by the name of Barry Jennings who came forward with his account from that morning when he was working at WTC7. The Loose Change buys interviewed him and got him on record. That morning, there were explosions in WTC, even BEFORE the North Tower ah exploded, and there were bodies in the lobby and a whole section of floor blown out.

He later died rather mysteriously and to this guy no one knows how he died. The LC guys even hired a private investigator to look into his death, who shortly thereafter returned the money and said he didn't want the case. Jennings family has since moved away, and the whole thing remains a mystery.

There were bombs all over the place that morning going off, and placing bombs in a building like WTC7, given who was housed in that building (Secret Service, DOD, CIA), cavedwellers like Bin Laden and his 19 merry men surely did not set.

And what would the conspirators provide evidence, of their own conspiracy, and why would other witnesses come forward when you see what happens to them..

There is a shadow government in the USA, which was very much involved in 9/11.

for what it's worth Silverstein clarified that when he made the comment he was actually meaning to pull all of the fireman out of the building so no lives would be lost trying to save it. seen it in one of the 9/11 Conspiracy Myths shows. not saying he wasn't lying through his teeth but that is the official rebuttal to that specific comment.

IMO the people that set the charges and other materials that brought down the WTC's are currently living in Israel. I honestly believe the Zionists had a major hand in the "demolition" of these buildings.
There have been several high-rise fires burning for days since 9/11 and they didn't collapse in a neat footprint.

911research.wtc7.net...

[edit on 17-9-2009 by Muundoggie]

Originally posted by stevegmu
You guys keep posting all this 'proof', yet not a single conspirator has come forward with evidence of a demolition job. Why is that? Surely someone would have come forward by now.

As someone said, they'd get in a tad of trouble since the so called whistle blower laws don't necessarily protect you from direct involvement.

Plus, I don't think they want to come back to USA after nearly being arrested that day. For now, they'd rather stay back home in that shizzle disturber of a country in the middle east no?

[edit on 17-9-2009 by Atlantican]

I don't understand why people try and make comparisons between buildings that are simply burning and don't collapse with the WTC towers. There is a HUGE difference in these two cases. The WTC towers didn't just have a fire burning in them, they had their very frame and structure severely damaged just by the brute force of the impact from the airplane, as well as the explosion of jet fuel which added even more force trauma to the structural integrity of where the planes hit.

You can't compare these two scenario's with a fire that simply starts small and spreads into an inferno. You must take into account the gaping hole the plane left and the force of the explosion of jet fuel on the structure itself, and THEN add the fire on top of that.

reply to post by Jnewell33

the official rebuttal to that specific comment.

Silverstein clarified that when he made the comment he was actually meaning to pull all of the fireman out of the building

Yes. But he was also attempting to collect 7 billion dollars worth of insurance money at the time. I don't doubt that he would retract any statement he might have made that could possibly have been interpreted to suggest that he agreed to demolition.

lying through his teeth

He certainly had motivation to.

reply to post by OmegaPoint


B. Jennings planted the explosives? Do you have a transcript of his account?

Have employees and former employees of Area 51 not come forward, describing things that have gone on at the base? Surely they have felt just as threatened.

People were in a panic. I'm sure many people thought they heard explosions going off all over the place.

It seems like such a complex plan just to destroy evidence. Surely a fire could have done the same job, or a shredder...

Originally posted by stevegmu
reply to post by OmegaPoint

 

B. Jennings planted the explosives? Do you have a transcript of his account?

...

It seems like such a complex plan just to destroy evidence. Surely a fire could have done the same job, or a shredder...

I may have missed something, but I don't see in Omega's post where he claims that B.Jennings planted anything. As for the explosions, I have seen video of firefighters talking and a huge explosion can be heard in the background. If it wasn't on this thread, it's on the other WTC 7 thread that started about the same time.

Edit to add (yeah, it's on this thread... this page, about halfway up)

And, yeah, you are right.. a fire and/or shredder is much simpler. It was just conjecture on my part anyway that it would be dropped to destory evidence. Even so, if it was, not everything burns or can go through a shredder.



[edit on 9-17-2009 by rogerstigers]

reply to post by Gdc934


No plane hit Building 7.

How did building 7 even catch on fire?

Originally posted by stevegmu
You guys keep posting all this 'proof', yet not a single conspirator has come forward with evidence of a demolition job. Why is that? Surely someone would have come forward by now.

No one has to come forward or admit anything for there to be PROOF that 9/11 was an inside job.

Basic common sense, facts, logic, science, math, visual evidence and witness testimony are more than enough to prove inside job beyond a shadow of a doubt. This is the most blatant conspiracy ever perpetrated.
A child can see it. If you can't see wtc7 was a CD nor comprehend the implications of what it means, then either you're blind, in denial, haven't done enough research or are a shill. Just the visual evidence alone is irrefutable, undeniable and incontrovertible.

But then Why would a conspirator come forward to admit they were apart of an operation that killed 3000 of his own country men? What makes you think if one wanted to they could without knowing they or their families would be threatened? You clearly aren't very logical or rational if you can't figure this out yourself.

You probably wouldn't in that situation, so what kind of twisted logic are you trying to push here?

you make no sense.

The excuses some people come up with to dismiss the perps and rationalize whats right in front of their eyes is unreal, dispicable, and borderline evil.

[edit on 18-9-2009 by Orion7911]

Originally posted by taylor101
Here is a video of Larry Silverstein admitting that he made the descion to pull wtc 7 which means bring it down with a controlled demoltion

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 17/9/09 by taylor101]

Can you answer the simple question - why? Why purposely demolish WTC 7? To what end? Do you think that the American people would have shrugged off the destruction of WTC 1,2 and the pentagon but when they saw the fall of WTC 7 they would have stood up and yelled "thats enough now, lets invade - something"!