I Challenge You Conspirators on This (Bombs on the Planes)

reply to post by Insolubrious


You guys defy belief!!!

It blows me away, how a stupid YouTube video can be claimed as "PROOF!!!"

I mean....it's such an obviously slanted and manipulated video....it'sick.

Am I the only one who saw the attempt at subliminal messaging?????

Sad, sad.

reply to post by Insolubrious

No - I expect that most of the plane should of exploded up against the facade of the building, raining down huge amounts of plane like debris, including luggage and people. Many plane parts should of fallen down yet nothing did, the whole plane was swallowed up by the building.

The exterior of WTC was NOT SOLID concrete or steel, It was a lattice work of steel beams BOLTED together in 30 ft high sections. Plane
hitting the building sheared the bolts holding exterior wall panels

Plane literally pushed wall in

Here is picture of section of exterior pannels - piece of aircraft embedded

Picture of wall panel lying in street

Originally posted by thedman
No it was hit by 110 story building

Does that count for anything?

No, not at all. Doesn't explain the molten metal, or free fall collapse.

Nice ... try... though...

Originally posted by Karilla

Originally posted by die_another_day
reply to post by turbofan

 

WTC 7 was obviously "pulled down"

Twin Towers and Pentagon works in my opinion.

It doesn't even come close to explaining the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, to my mind. The big problem there is how the monumental, and undamaged, sections below the impact points lost all their structural integrity at the moment of collapse, allowing the building to free-fall, not to mention removing the moment of inertia of the top of the south tower that began to topple and rotate.... and then stopped rotating to fall straight down.

Bombs on the planes does not get rid of the core columns.

[edit on 23-9-2009 by Karilla]

The twins were quite larger than BUILDING SEVEN the one felled by CD alone.
To address the twins ---take into consideration the CD obvious in all video.
Compound that with the total possibility of a craft loaded to the tail section
with the latest in steel melting chemicals. They would attack the lower super
structure with a vengeance and keep melting for weeks.
Hence helping to collapse the buildings in thier footprint.

reply to post by Donny 4 million

Compound that with the total possibility of a craft loaded to the tail section
with the latest in steel melting chemicals.

Steel Melting chemicals?

Never heard of anything so stupid

Of course when a truther is confronted with reality usual response is
to invent something completely insane.....

Originally posted by thedman

hitting the building sheared the bolts holding exterior wall panels

Plane literally pushed wall in

No it didn't. There are clear, high resolution images (also known as evidence) showing that the plane cut through the mid-section of these steel sections. It didn't just fail at the bolted connections it sliced right through. There are clearly long diagonal cuts where the wings went through the steel all the way to the tips.

The weight of the top might have been enough to collapse the building without the bottom being damaged at first.

So if there was enough thermite on the plane to melt a few floors of the steel then the structural integrity of the building will fail.

posted by thedman

hitting the building sheared the bolts holding exterior wall panels

Plane literally pushed wall in

posted by Insolubrious

No it didn't. There are clear, high resolution images (also known as evidence) showing that the plane cut through the mid-section of these steel sections. It didn't just fail at the bolted connections it sliced right through. There are clearly long diagonal cuts where the wings went through the steel all the way to the tips.

thedman don't you ever bother to look at the actual evidence?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/64328f708245.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d761faa72feb.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/06098ae8274c.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/96adaf72aee9.jpg[/atsimg]

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Donny 4 million

 

Compound that with the total possibility of a craft loaded to the tail section
with the latest in steel melting chemicals.

Steel Melting chemicals?


Never heard of anything so stupid

Of course when a truther is confronted with reality usual response is
to invent something completely insane.....

You know what is resoundingly stupid thed.---The phony, disgusting, stupid story you subscribe to. The one that says the chemicals needed to melt the steel that day were right in the friggin building already. Duh!
So whatever was in those planes was just complimentary.
COME on BACK hear! I need a good spin!!!! And another laugh.

reply to post by SPreston


With more than one tear on my cheek and an ever growing hole in my hart.
I asked myself to think positive. Like John Walsh and his son's tragedy.
America's Most Wanted.
Does that hole match in dimension the size of the aircraft
purported in the Commissions fabrications?
Anyone?

reply to post by SPreston


Maybe should refer to your own pictures

Exterior panels were composed of vertical beams connected together
by horizontal spandrel plates - which were bolted to the vertical members

The spandrel panels interconnecting them comprise steel plates, 1.32 m deep. 12 m above the entrance level the columns are combined in groups of three to form single base columns, spaced at 3.05 m centres and with an overall cross-section of 800 x 800 mm.

The panels were connected to each other by bolts in 30 ft high panels

The external framework was erected using prefabricated three-storey units, each comprising columns interconnected by spandrel panels. These units, ranging in weight from 22.3 to 6.0 tonnes, were fitted together, alternately staggered in one storey heights, and spliced with high-strength friction-grip bolts.

The aircraft impacts caused many of the panels to fail at the connections
- either at the spandrel plates connecting the vertical beams or at the connections with the other panels

reply to post by Donny 4 million


This is a repeat.

I am sorry to be the one to point this out.

This thread's premise (Bombs on the Planes) is so far off, and out in Never-Never-Land it barely merits full attention.

Just another in the continuing series of increasingly incredible "conspiracy theories"....and the sad thing is, the people who are "behind" this
ever-increasingly repeated 'thread'.....just repeat the same pseudo-science. In the guise of "aviation"....

Only a few of us can recognize BS when we see it....and that is part of the problem.....

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Donny 4 million

 

This is a repeat.

I am sorry to be the one to point this out.

This thread's premise (Bombs on the Planes) is so far off, and out in Never-Never-Land it barely merits full attention.

Just another in the continuing series of increasingly incredible "conspiracy theories"....and the sad thing is, the people who are "behind" this
ever-increasingly repeated 'thread'.....just repeat the same pseudo-science. In the guise of "aviation"....

Only a few of us can recognize BS when we see it....and that is part of the problem.....

Well then, get your butt out of the simulator and pay FULL attention to the 911 TRAGEDIES.
You know why weedy?
There are ALOT of us here that can see straight through your BS.
No problem here.