It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
MIAMI BEACH, Florida (CNN) -- On the grainy, silent black and white video, it's hard to tell exactly what happened the night of June 14 in Miami Beach. But one thing is certain: A tourist, Husien Shehada, can be seen falling to the ground, shot by a police officer. Shehada, 29, later died.
Four nights later, again in Miami Beach, Lawrence McCoy allegedly pistol-whipped a cab driver and led police on a chase. Police say shots were exchanged. McCoy, also 29, was killed.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Aggie Man
Aggie, that is a tough one. Maybe the officer was the perfect guy to get put back on the job. It is unfortunate, but the account of the second situation sounds like he did a great job, so without knowing more of the first situation, we have to assume he is a good cop!
I have never agreed with the mandatory off-duty period. The last thing I want when I am upset or depressed, is a bunch of free time to mull it over!!
So, if the shootings were justified, and the correct people got killed, and the cop is obviously decisive and a decent shot, then I say keep him on the street as much as possible!
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
...they are placed on 72 hour leave, and the shooting is investigated. If it was found to be a "bad shot" so to speak, they are not put back out right away.
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Okay, I saw this story and thought I would post it and see what the ATS consensus is. This thread is not intended to accuse the officer of any abuse of powers, rather to discuss the police department's handling of the officer after the first shooting. After shooting and killing the suspect in the first shooting, the officer was placed on 72 hours leave.
Although it is not yet clear whether Tavss fired one of the shots that killed McCoy, questions are being raised as to whether the officer was cleared for patrol duty too soon after the first shooting.
Originally posted by Ferris.Bueller.II
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Okay, I saw this story and thought I would post it and see what the ATS consensus is. This thread is not intended to accuse the officer of any abuse of powers, rather to discuss the police department's handling of the officer after the first shooting. After shooting and killing the suspect in the first shooting, the officer was placed on 72 hours leave.
OK, the article says:
Although it is not yet clear whether Tavss fired one of the shots that killed McCoy, questions are being raised as to whether the officer was cleared for patrol duty too soon after the first shooting.
Do you have any further updates to this article stating Tavss did fire one of the shots that killed McCoy?
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Point being, how many confirmed kills does one need to have before it affects their mentality? I hear of soldiers in combat that "go nuts" after shooting 1 enemy...surly officers are no more strong willed and psychologically sound than soldiers. So should psychological evaluations and counseling be available and mandatory? Or is that something that is already in place within the law enforcement system.
[edit on 16-9-2009 by Aggie Man]