It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Reached by PM, Gladwell confirmed this account but, concerned about ongoing harassment by conspiracy theorists, asked not to be quoted directly.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
The wreckage shown in the Iranian crash doesn't look like a plane either. It looks like unidentifiable pieces of twisted junk, and I would not recognize any of it as being from a plane had I not been told that this was being filmed at a crash site.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
The wreckage shown in the Iranian crash doesn't look like a plane either. It looks like unidentifiable pieces of twisted junk, and I would not recognize any of it as being from a plane had I not been told that this was being filmed at a crash site.
You didn't see the long wing section laying on the ground? Did you watch the entire footage?
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Yes, I did. What long "wing section"? Nothing I saw resembled anything I could easily identify with an aircraft. It looked like warped, twisted, destroyed metal.
The wreckage shown in the Iranian crash doesn't look like a plane either. It looks like unidentifiable pieces of twisted junk, and I would not recognize any of it as being from a plane had I not been told that this was being filmed at a crash site.
Originally posted by thedman
As for people on board (were 4) - what was left was "human hamburger"
bits of shredded flesh, only recognizable was 1/2 of chest, hand minus
fingers, some amputated fingers. Walked crash scene marking bits of
flesh with flags for coroner to recover
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Yes, I did. What long "wing section"? Nothing I saw resembled anything I could easily identify with an aircraft. It looked like warped, twisted, destroyed metal.
Well, then show me the "warped, twisted metal at Shanksville."? Have you seen any photos? I haven't.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Not to mention that there is also the soil at the strip mine to account for much wreckage being buried.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
As dman kindly pointed out, it is exactly what you might expect from a high speed vertical impact of a large plane.
Not to mention that there is also the soil at the strip mine to account for much wreckage being buried.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Not to mention that there is also the soil at the strip mine to account for much wreckage being buried.
Skadi, please prove what you are trying to claim here?
Casual readers to this thread should note that a lot of official government story believers have contradicted themselves and each other, with regards to the soft soil swallowing the plane.
THE DEBRIS FIELD. The reclaimed mine where the plane crashed is composed of very soft soil, and searchers say much of the wreckage was found buried 20-25 feet below the large crater. But despite that, there was also widely scattered debris in the immediate vicinity and further afield. Considerable debris washed up more than two miles away at Indian Lake, and a canceled check and brokerage statement from the plane was found in a deep valley some eight miles away that week.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
What evidence do YOU have that the soil at Shanksville was not soft? Or how this applies to your larger theory?
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
I have looked up legit news reports and locals staements.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
What evidence do YOU have that the soil at Shanksville was not soft? Or how this applies to your larger theory?
Perhaps you are not aware of the aftermath of a plane crash. When flight 427 crashed in Pittsburgh, the moon township fire dept reported that the tree tops were filled with human remains. Besides the witnesses seeing a missle shoot down flight 93, there were no remains where the crater was., nor in the nearby trees. Also Mr.Rumsfld had a bad slip of the tongue. Flight 93 was headed for the whitehouse. PTB had it "taken out".
"The remains of a number of passengers had been found in all five [search] sectors."
...Miller was familiar with scenes of sudden and violent death, although none quite like this. Walking in his gumboots, the only recognisable body part he saw was a piece of spinal cord, with five vertebrae attached. 'I've seen a lot of highway fatalities where there's fragmentation,' Miller said. 'The interesting thing about this particular case is that I haven't, to this day, 11 months later, seen any single drop of blood. Not a drop. The only thing I can deduce is that the crash was over in half a second. There was a fireball 15-20 metres high, so all of that material just got vaporised.'"
"We went through here on our hands and knees hundreds of times"
As coroner, responsible for returning human remains, Miller has been forced to share with the families information that is unimaginable. As he clinically recounts to them, holding back very few details, the 33 passengers, seven crew and four hijackers together weighed roughly 7,000 pounds. They were essentially cremated together upon impact. Hundreds of searchers who climbed the hemlocks and combed the woods for weeks were able to find about 1,500 mostly scorched samples of human tissue totaling less than 600 pounds, or about 8 percent of the total.
In Pennsylvania, Somerset County coroner Wallace E. Miller and his team scoured the "halo"—the field and woods surrounding the crater left when United Airlines Flight 93 plunged into the ground. The debris was everywhere. Trees were draped with scraps of luggage, clothing, bits of the fuselage and human remains. Walking through the crash site in the days after the attacks, Miller's eye caught a flash of light 20 feet up in the branches of a hemlock tree. "I only noticed it because the sun happened to hit it at just the right angle," he says. A tree climber brought it down. It was a single tooth with a silver filling. Eventually it was matched to one of the passengers.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
What evidence do YOU have that the soil at Shanksville was not soft? Or how this applies to your larger theory?
How about the US Geological Survey? Does that count?
As far as I can see, Shanksville is in the Glenshaw formation and Allegeney group. Both of which consist of sandstone, shale, limestone, and coal. Are these substances "soft soil"?
www.dcnr.state.pa.us...
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Did you miss the part about the crash site being a RECLAIMED STRIP MINE? In other words, a bunch of soft soil dumped to fill up an abandoned mine? A bunch of loose dirt? Have you forgotten that part?
Decommissioning a Strip Mine…
There are a number of people who claim that the soil around the site was ‘loosely packed’ because it was an old, filled-in strip mine.
How realistic is it, then, that when the strip mine at Shanksville (called Diamond T) was decommissioned, the mine operators simply poured in truckloads of soft sand, and everyone shook hands and walked away. In short, not realistic at all, because in decommissioning the mine, the same government environmental branch would have to be satisfied that VERY STRICT decommissioning requirements had been met.
I looked it up. It's covered by the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 1977 (SMCRA), and administered by the Office of Surface Mining. This is just one of the 60 Federal laws and regulations which must be adhered to which apply specifically to coal mining.
One of the requirements of the Act is the preparation (BEFORE mining even starts) of a reclamation plan, which needs to be assessed and approved. To quote: "The broad objectives of the rehabilitation program were to eliminate soil and water pollution on and around the site, and to produce a STABLE LANDFORM with a self-sustaining vegetative cover…"
The reclaiming of the decommissioned strip mine was under strict Federal laws surrounding strip mining activities. For the 'Official Story' to continue to claim that the ground was 'loosely packed' or 'soft' because of an old strip mine that used to operate is completely ignoring the masses of Federal laws and regulations which would have ensured that the area was returned to its PRE-MINING STATE (which is a term used throughout the legislation).
These legislative requirements for decommissioning a strip mine IN
PENNSYLVANIA can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 30,
Volume 3, Part 398 Pennsylvania.
"Section 938.1 SCOPE - This part contains all rules applicable only
within Pennsylvania that have been adopted under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977".
Therefore, one of the nearly 60 Federal laws surrounding strip mines required the land to be returned to its PRE-MINING STATE when the mine was closed. This is in direct contradiction to the 'official story', who claim that the presence of the old strip mine left the soil ‘loosely packed’.
There is plenty of information around on the strict requirements about the reclamation plans required for the decommissioning of a strip mine:
“Reclamation
Reclamation is the process of restoring disturbed land as closely as possible to its original condition when mining is finished. All mine sites must be reclaimed according to applicable governmental regulations. This typically involves a number of activities including: reshaping the land, restoring topsoil, and planting native grasses, trees or ground cover. Reclamation is done according to the approved closure and reclamation plan, which must be continuously updated by the mining company and approved by the responsible government agency”.
And:
“What is a Mine Closure and Reclamation Plan?
Planning for mine closure starts during mine planning... Under existing
legislation, mine owners must submit a mine closure and reclamation plan to the [state] and/or federal government. The government must approve the initial closure and reclamation plans before any mine development work can begin. However, the development of final plans may take years of study and detailed engineering before being completed. The company must also put up money (e.g., a deposit or bond) to make sure that it can complete the reclamation, including shut-down, closure and post-closure. The financial assurance may be a few million dollars for a small mine or over $100 million for a large mine. The deposit makes sure that the government will not be left with the responsibility of paying for a mine closure as has happened in the past because abandoned mines become property of the governments.
A mine closure and reclamation plan for any mine is site-specific. It details
how the mining company will close the mine site and return the surrounding land, as closely as possible, to its pre-mining state”.
Therefore, there is no way that the surrounding soil from the alleged Flight 93 crash would have been the 'loosely packed' remains of the old strip mine. The mine would have had Federal regulations applied during decommissioning to return it to its premining state.
Originally posted by Skadi
Here's a little newsflash: mining companies are not exactly the most ethical, environmentally conscious people, and guess what! The majority of the time, they use all sorts of federal loopholes, legal nitpicking, and dirty tricks to do half-assed jobs.
Originally posted by Skadi
Regardless of what federal mining reclaimation regulations state, or what a company might claim, the truth is the reclaimed stripmine is often sadly, no where near what it should be.
Originally posted by Skadi
Reports from people who have been there and the pictures themselves show soft, loose soil that no where near resembles the original state of the land.