It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
And people laughed at us and called us truthers. They don't even know the facts... we've been looking at this thing from like the last few years. I know that other people have different views on us than we do... but it's about time that people stop name-calling us as truthers and stop stereotyping our beliefs and we have a real investigation of 9-11. I'm not about to hold my breath either but it's about time people woke up to this.
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
Originally posted by menjo2000
So, COME ON!! If ol' Uncle George had something to do with 9/11, he would have been tarred, feathered, drawn and quartered. Seriously!!
...hate to bust your little pro-republican / anti-democrat bubble but 911 and the state of our country ever since has nothing at all to do with political parties because they mean nothing at all - nothing - nada - zilch...
Originally posted by Make Speed Limit 45
Originally posted by menjo2000
I've always been curious... the people that say 9/11 was a cover up by our own government, seem to think that Ol' Bush was to blame.
I don't know of any truther who thinks that. I certainly don't. I've always been puzzled how bushie sat in that school room and did nothing after he was told of the attacks. He didn't know what to do because he wasn't in on it.
Mind you, Bush deserves to hang for his involvement in the coverup but i doubt very much if he was in on the planning for 911.
Originally posted by Make Speed Limit 45
Originally posted by poet1b
If it is shown that the jet fuel could not have taken down the buildings, how big will the resulting media explosion be?
They're not gonna ever prove that. There are just too many variables....And even if they did prove it, the media would just bury the story like they have buried the smoking gun story of Building 7.
Originally posted by poet1b
Honestly I think the only way they could prove all, beyond reasonable doubt, would be a miniature mock up of the towers.
I have to wonder how much it would cost to create a realistic mock up, good enough to prove what so many see. I think it could be possible.
Originally posted by liveandlearn
reply to post by poet1b
From your quoted article.
Munyak and his fellow AE911 supporters recently received acknowledgement from the FBI's counterterrorism division, which concluded that the organization's core evidence deserves—and will get—FBI scrutiny. In a letter, Deputy Director Michael J. Heimbach assessed AE911's presentation as "backed by thorough research and analysis."
I won't hold my breath for the FBI to investigate but I am wondering, why now?
This has been out there for a long time.
Originally posted by Komodo
hmmmm..So your stating that 839 architectural and engineering professionals don't know what they are talking about?? !!
Show us and the 839 architectural and engineering professionals the variables that WILL cause JET fuel to MELT Structural I-beams....I perused an AA degree in Welding and got within 23 credits of having the degree and HAVE welded and cut IRON/Steel and if anyone else has, IT TAKES A HELL OF ALOT OF HEAT TO MELT it over a period of time..
So, please present the data to us and the 839 architectural and engineering professionals just in case we might have missed something..
IF you can't, PLEASE DON'T MAKE STATEMENTS YOU CAN'T BACK UP WITH DATA!
and yes.. I've been a US Citizen which upholds the laws of Physics (truther) since 9/11/2001 !
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by JIMC5499
Thermite has a great many more ingredients in it than aluminum and iron oxide, and if the scientist claim it has a special chemical signature, I would tend to believe the experts.
When you apply an extremely high temperature to a complicated compound like thermite, it definitely does create a unique chemical signature.
That the thermite signature is in 9-11 dust certainly proves that thermite was used, and apparently in large quantities.
They just need sample that they can clearly trace to the 9-11 disaster, that is what they are missing for proof that would stand up in court. All they need is a better paper trail of documentation.
[edit on 12-9-2009 by poet1b]
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by JIMC5499
Got any evidence to back up this claim?
Got any knowledge of chemistry at all to back up this claim?
I guess the engineers and scientists who stated that they found the signatures of thermite in the dust don't know as much about chemistry as you do, or they are just putting out a bunch of nonsense to claim credibility?
Or you are just spouting off nonsense out of pure ignorance?
Which is most likely?