posted on Sep, 8 2009 @ 12:07 AM
Came across a theory that Cain was cursed because he was the child of Satan and Eve rather than Adam and Eve (as was Abel and the third child, Seth).
Some believe that when looking more closely at the original (as opposed to translations) of the book of Genesis, it is much more explicit in the sense
that when the "serpent beguiled Eve" this is a clear sexual reference that has been sort of euphamized in the translations of the bibile. Thus, run
the theory, the serpent seedline carries the Satanic, reptillian/serpentine legacy intermingiled with humanity (Cf, various reptoid/annunaki theories,
etc.). The "Mark of cain" is this serpentine legacy in the blood of certain families, which later became "the illuminati"/TPTB/black nobility of
Europe, etc.
So what does the FC braintrust say?