It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Rest easy: SETI’s Seth Shostak explains why extraterrestrials won’t snatch you from your bed
This is not a trivial solace. ....
Most abduction reports involve being involuntarily hauled out of one’s home or auto, followed by a short session of meddlesome experiments at the smooth-and-cool hands of a gray-skinned extraterrestrial. Frequently, the aliens play doctor, removing sperm or eggs from their victims without so much as a consent form or the slightest romantic gesture.
The usual explanation for such brutish behavior is that the extraterrestrials have come to our world because of reproductive problems on their own. They want hybrid babies (for some reason). But the idea that any species would resort to interstellar travel for breeding purposes seems ludicrous.
Salmon will swim a few hundred miles to spawn, but the nearest stars are a lot farther than that—tens of trillions of miles, at a minimum.
In addition, I note that the salmon have the good sense to reproduce with other salmon. We can’t breed with another species, despite the occasional barnyard attempt. That’s true even though every living thing on this planet has the same biochemistry as you. We all share DNA, and for the more familiar life forms, quite a lot of DNA. Anything you’re likely to see at the zoo has DNA that’s at least 75 percent identical to your own. There’s no reason to assume that the aliens have DNA at all.
Breeding won’t work. But there’s another point: the aliens don’t know we’re here. Evidence for the existence of Homo sapiens—in the form of FM radio, television, and radar signals—has only been leaking off this planet for about 70 years. No aliens farther than half that number (in light-years) have had time enough to sense our presence, and rocket to Earth to snatch you from the bedroom.
Originally posted by jkrog08
How can he judge the motives any better than the abductees themselves? The truth is if anyone knows the true motives it is only a select few, but that is only if you think the governments know much more than they say.
Originally posted by jkrog08
Just because those distances are large to us does not mean they are large to an advanced alien species.
Originally posted by jkrog08
Correct, no reason to assume they have DNA at all, but with the recent findings of amino acid on a comet, as well other previous findings of other building blocks of DNA I think the argument for ET DNA is getting very strong.
Originally posted by jkrog08
Additionally there is no reason to assume that an advanced race capable of traversing vast distances between stars can not figure out how to acheive highly advanced genetic feats.
Originally posted by jkrog08
His worst point IMO, Dr. Shotak is assuming that aliens are bound by our limited communication, propulsion, and observation techniques--Which even our own scientists realize are very primitive compared to what appears to be possible via Quantum Mechanics and such.
Originally posted by jkrog08
Also is it not rational to think a highly advanced, space faring species would not 'wait around' for signals from other intelligence, but go and look for themselves? We know we surely would.
If 2 percent of Americans are abducted, that’s 7 million victims in the current generation, just in the United States. You’d expect some good, physical evidence for that, beyond stories told by the abductees.
Indeed, world-wide the number of supposed alien abductees exceeds the number of Africans who were taken from their homes for the slave trade. No one doubts that the forcible abduction of slaves took place. There are the descendants of the abductees of course, but also physical evidence of the abductors.
Originally posted by jkrog08
I am not claiming alien abduction is true or not...
I do think he follows it up with a very strong point, perhaps most damning to alien abduction as a physical phenomenon...
If 2 percent of Americans are abducted, that’s 7 million victims in the current generation, just in the United States. You’d expect some good, physical evidence for that, beyond stories told by the abductees.
Indeed, world-wide the number of supposed alien abductees exceeds the number of Africans who were taken from their homes for the slave trade. No one doubts that the forcible abduction of slaves took place. There are the descendants of the abductees of course, but also physical evidence of the abductors.
There have been some examples of trace evidence in abductions, but nothing that cannot be explained in more prosaic terms and nothing that has been considered by independent sources. Compared to the number of people supposedly being abducted on a regular basis, you would think this evidence would be much more common and less transient.
Originally posted by xXCalieXx
I always had a theory that humans were abducted based on their genetic makeup and how perfect their genetic history is. It is just a theory...I always wonder what the family history is of an "abductee" is or if sleep paralysis is genetic.