It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by punkinworks09
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
OK there no way an atom bomb was used in North africa, yet another well documented engagment. I had an uncle who served in NA and fought with pattons II corp, had a nuclear weapon been used word of it would have spread like wildfire through the ranks, and people would have surely talked about it.
If no one was around Rommel for miles around there may not have
been any witnesses except the Rommel troops.
How all this can be even hinted at seems quite hard but why send
Rommel to North Africa and back again with some mysterious reward.
If found usable in sea launched missiles there might be a good reason
for the scuttle of subs at sea at the end of the war
Originally posted by Xtrozero
I would think if the Germans had a nuke it would have been used in Europe, London most likely as the best choice. Remember they totally destroyed Warsaw and Hitler gave the orders to level Paris too, so if they had a nuke it would have been used on a major European city.
Originally posted by punkinworks09
a six Gy dose of radiation is lethal and a neutron bomb delivers an 80Gy dose.
And any armored vehicles irradiated will stat lethally radioactive for 24-48 hrs making re-crewing the vehicle difficult.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
I would think if the Germans had a nuke it would have been used in Europe, London most likely as the best choice. Remember they totally destroyed Warsaw and Hitler gave the orders to level Paris too, so if they had a nuke it would have been used on a major European city.